Politician Archive

Lord Branbar city warn is not supposed to be a tool in for the GCW it is a tool to stop jerkwads from being arses in your city. So that you can maintain a level of integrity to your city. If that level of integrity involves no rebels/imperials that cool, but that doesnt mean you should be able to kill anyone who comes into your city at will. Without city warn there is now no way to kick someone out of your city, but in the current system its just a free-for all TEF system. It needs to be what it is called, citywarn. Warns people to get out of your town then if they dont what it does it makes it so you can force them out. I dont think /citwarn should be removed it just needs to be modified.

Ya no kidding I got warned within like 30 seconds of being in a City because of my Tags... anyways I only had 30 seconds and I am Expert Ranger and I could still not run from the city to the outskirts within 30 seconds... I would be for removing /Citywarn altogehter but then no point of militia... however how it is it needs to be extended and possibly changed in some other ways so that people cannot use it for griefing..

So if you are Imp don't go to insurgo on Naboo on Kettemoor as half their militia is abunch of pricks who are so insecure the won't let you come buy anything or look

if you are covert, deal. You're part of the GCW. /warn is no different from walking past a scanner, effectively.

I would happily accept either of these changes to warn if /ban was made to work effectively.

~~Shabhaii, Mayor of Tombra, Naboo
www.cityoftombra.com
The REAL BT
"The FS system only rewards the Veruca Salt's of the MMO world . . . not the Charlie's"

1. Stop the lawyer using words like consenual pvp.

2. Make the citywarn a city eject. If they come back in 24hr hours then they have chosen to do so and it is then consenual.

3. Why are you on a faction if you dont expect to fight.

There is no need to remove city warn, but it should be exactly what it is called. CityWarn, not city auto-tef. The length has been extended to 2 minutes, im not sure if this is long enough but it might need to be a tiny bit longer. The criteria that needs to be met for the proper length of the citywarn timer. t needs to be long enough so that an average player has time to walk out of an average Metropelis size city. This is so that once a player has been warned they have time to get out of the city. The purpose of citywarn is to warn people and tell them to get out of the your city, they need to have time to leave the city. But if they do not want to leave and persist in whatever is making you not want them in your city, then they will become attackable.

The 2nd change that should be made is that it takes 2 warns to make a TEF appear, the purpose of this is that it is actually a warn. If a player is doing something against your city rules they get a first warning, then there is a timer of id say 1 minute before you can do the 2nd warning. This is so that they know clearly they are doing something wrong and they know if they continue in doing what they are doing they will be warned again and become attackable. This also gives the people to talk out the solution instead of no time. If there is just 1 warn and a timer long enough just to get out of the city then there is no way for the problem to be resolved, the player that is warned will just have to run out of the city if they dont want to be attack. But if you have 2 warns, first you acknowlage a problem, then try to resolve it. Second it gives them time to get out of the city before being attacked.

Seriously, if you are complaining about getting /citywarn, then you obviously have no idea what can happen after its removed. "But it's griefing", so are about 100 other exploits that the dev's seem to turn their heads on. Non-consentual pvp? Its a FREAKIN CIVIL WAR, join it or shut up. You cry babies are ruining the game week by week.

I swear there are so many other things that the whiny kids can worry about, /citywarn should not be one of them. If you are in a city and you are not wanted in that city, there should be some means to forcibly remove you. The Dev's are retarded for even thinking of changing this one little thing. And the whole POI thing is crap. If you want to get somewhere there is always a way in, stop complaining. Honestly you cry babies need to play online scrabble or something, leave the real gaming to people who know how handle any situation.

---

LordBranamar wrote:

Seriously, if you are complaining about getting /citywarn, then you obviously have no idea what can happen after its removed. "But it's griefing", so are about 100 other exploits that the dev's seem to turn their heads on. Non-consentual pvp? Its a FREAKIN CIVIL WAR, join it or shut up. You cry babies are ruining the game week by week.

I swear there are so many other things that the whiny kids can worry about, /citywarn should not be one of them. If you are in a city and you are not wanted in that city, there should be some means to forcibly remove you. The Dev's are retarded for even thinking of changing this one little thing. And the whole POI thing is crap. If you want to get somewhere there is always a way in, stop complaining. Honestly you cry babies need to play online scrabble or something, leave the real gaming to people who know how handle any situation.

---

Umm... he is proposing changes to it... not proposing removing it....