Politician Archive
Thread: What is the point of living in a city if you can still use their shuttle port?
Why would you want to make it private? The city makes money off of each ticket sold to leave the city. My guess is that you have houses popping up outside your city radius and you think they are taking advantage of your city shuttle and not paying taxes or living in the city. Am I right?
TitusAndronikus wrote:
Why would you want to make it private? The city makes money off of each ticket sold to leave the city. My guess is that you have houses popping up outside your city radius and you think they are taking advantage of your city shuttle and not paying taxes or living in the city. Am I right?
I can see that, but it would still be a waste imo. Besides not too many citits have taxes that high..so its really not an issue for most. Thats assuming that the senerio you descibed above is whats happening.
shuttles are limitted enough as it is.. I don't see a point in "privatizing" it. If you keep your city at level for maintaining a shuttleport, (no more, no less) a whole 55 people are authorized to use it? (provided you have 55 live residents, no placeholders)
Pointless.
I like the idea of a private shuttleport. But my idea of a private shuttleport is a bit different. I think for cities that don't fit the requirements for a shuttleport(55 people) there should be a private shuttleport that only the citizens of the city can use. That way cities won't have to find 20+ n00bs to place housesin order to have a form of transportation to there city and would encourage ppl to be more creative with the placement of their cities.
Just a thought.