Pistoleer Archive

My first Template.

BH Carbine 4, Pistol 4, LLC4.....10k Invest exp banked, not buying atm. Pistoleer 0,3,4,0.

I am currently in the process of giving up the LLC to gain more pistoleer skills....With that, what exactly am I in your opinion? For you yourself have said "I can use under hand shot to KD", andyour sig has 0040 BH. So in essence our templates, when I am done will be much the same.

If you will look at my number of posts, I have posted more on the pistoleer boards then on the BH ones. Not only that, but I have defended the pistoleers postion to nearly every other class, uncluding being one of the first to speak out against the fw5 nerf.

Agree with me or do not agree with me, but trying to slander me and say that I am a BH troll, simply because my opinions differ from yours is childish at best.

If maturity and level-headedness is a mandate for correspondents then I think he'll be just fine. But if that is the case, then how does Wepps have that position as well?

I agree, infact Philosphers on normally extreamly level headed and well thought out.

However, the reason for this post is that I disagreed with him on the defense Issue. He of course disgreed back, and that was fine. I went on to continue the discussion with others within the thread, and instead of responding Philospher resorted to a personal attack on me. Not to mention as you can see he was just being incredibly rude.

Disagreement is one thing, I would have been fine with him even telling me I was dead wrong end of story and coversation. However personal attack and slander are another, that is unccaptable behavior, especially from somone who is to be communicating with the dev's on the future of the skill tree.

As for wepps....I only calrfied him "fwg5" statement, I did not defend him personally, nor do I intend to.

I agree, infact Philosphers on normally extreamly level headed and well thought out.

Sorry, trying to play and type..Thats supposed to read

I agree, infact Philosphers posts are normally extreamly level headed and well though out.

I will not argue that point, infact besides Noules I think hes discovery of the speed formula as well as the DPS calculations between classes involving the AP issues have helped more over all then nearly any other posts.

extremely

Taewyn,

You don't get on my nerves as much as you do on some peoples... even though I strongly disagree with you about profession balance. I think combat effectiveness should be contained in single elite classes, and extra skill points should be fun abilities and icing on the cake, not unbalancing in combat. In a game with so many fun mechanics to try out, who wants to be forced to spend all their points on combat to be effective?

but come on! this thread was total troll bait. "who is more of a "pure" pistoleer, me or you?"

What kind of response were you hoping to get to that?

I'm bored, but even so I'm a little embarrassed that I'm bumping this thread.

I am a pure pistoleer... (only combat skill is Pistoleer and wht is neded to become one.(master i am yes... ))

And i say we need some serious help... I think its the dabblers that make us look overpowered or doing just fine.. so we get no lovin

This was honestly not flame/troll bait. This was in response to Philosphers rudeness on another thread.

I disagreed with him on the defense improvments, which he then disgreed back with me about...Which was fine.

However the debate continued between me and a few others, and in the end some people brought up good points, like Eletricnomad. However, out of no where Philospher jumps in and attempts to label me as a BH troll.

I just had to point out the delightful Irony that Philospher is also a BH, and I am also a Pistoleer.

As for the pure pistoleer argument, there are things that I would like to see the pistoleer get. Certain changes and improvments I would love, however the being slandered as a "BH troll" is uncalled for.

Also, my future plans....

I was at one time planning on MBH...Infact if I buy invest one and two I am only 2 boxes from it.

But as time goes on I am leaning more towards pistoleer, I am to the point now where I am slowly giving up my BH skills for pistoleer, and eventually will probably be a pistoleer/TKA (Or a pistoleer/fencer).

So if my posts on this board have increased over the past few weeks, that is why.

This isn't about who is a "pure" Pistoleer. I don't care if you have 1 Pistoleer box or 15.

You're a troll who comes on this board every few weeks to hijack threads with long-winded posts that say Pistoleer shouldn't be a standalone profession and "works" because it's a nice add-on for Bounty Hunters.

Your goal is usually to provoke a reaction from people, just like you're trying to do in this thread. You hijack some threads, get everyone on the forum riled up and upset, and then leave. Then you come back a week later, rinse and repeat. The prototypical forum troll.

I've been around here for months, so I've been around the block with you already. Your act is getting old, and I don't intend to feed the troll.

Don't expect any more replies from me -- I have better things to do than babysit you.

Expect to see me around alot more Phil, I am going to be here every day...As I move to the pistoleer as my new profession, choose to respond or not to respond, however each time you slander me, when i have done nothing wrong I will PM TH with a link to that thread.

Your opinions are fine, even if they disagree with my own, but you are the new corropondent now, you have no right to flame me, or what I think of this professions future and or development.

A pure pistoleer:
Master Pistoleer, Marksman 0-4-0-0, and 158 unused skill points. Sounds fairly boring.

---

Taewyn wrote:

Expect to see me around alot more Phil, I am going to be here every day...As I move to the pistoleer as my new profession, choose to respond or not to respond, however each time you slander me, when i have done nothing wrong I will PM TH with a link to that thread.

Your opinions are fine, even if they disagree with my own, but you are the new corropondent now, you have no right to flame me, or what I think of this professions future and or development.

---

Being the new correspondent means he has to alter his behavior, why's that? He's still just a person, he's not an employee of SOE.

If maturity and level-headedness is a mandate for correspondents then I think he'll be just fine. But if that is the case, then how does Wepps have that position as well?

It's not only about being a pistoleer, you also need to be likable. So Taewyn would make a lousy correspondent.