Pistoleer Archive
Thread: Should rename this the BH vs Pistoleer forum...
"Should rename this the BH vs Pistoleer forum... "
Your correspondent called for a nurf on another class in his report and you're surprized that the other class invaded your boards....
What did you expect?
1. I asked for no nerfs, please don't spread mistruths.
2. I used an excel spreadsheet to tally the votes on the issues page, what you see is what the community wants.
3. There are already enough threads on this topic, you add nothing new. You could easily find one that's already there and continue the thread rather than start a new one. At least then you could change your subject heading.
Cuz that'st he only posts that ever seem to get posted here...
As a pistoleer I think BH should beat a pure pistoleer in 1v1. That is to say someone who is Master Pistoleer vs someone who is Master BH. (or novice and novice with same amount in each tree, etc.) Why? I think anyone who has spent more skillpoints (unless they spent them on non combat ***by choice***) should be more powerful.
If Pistoleers want to be on par with BH they need to spend the skillpoints in lines that compliment their pistol skills. BH is cookie cutter, but you cannot simply say they should be mediocre with a pistol because master marksmen takes diff weapons. They are FORCED to take those. A master pistoleer can also be a master CH. Now who's more powerful? How about a masterpistoleer who's a master medic? Or even a novice combat medic with several skills?
In any of the cases where a Master pistoleer has spent points on complimenting combat abilities (combat medic, creature handler, Smuggler, Possibly terras kasi) Then the BH should definitely NOT be more powerful. But any time someone who was forced to spend 200+ points to get an ability comes up against someone who spent 98 points to get their ability... The 200+ point ability should win.