Pistoleer Archive
Thread: Weak showing in the IC Board folks... Pistoleers, lets have a little talk shall we?
Great post! Bingchudiesummed it up pretty well. What is wrong with you guys? Go to that thread, please. Read it atleast. The things that are being said over there, those are the things that are going to happen. Make sure your voice is heard.
I know we've given our input before and gotten little to no results, but I think the devs really are serious this time. The devs recognize how out of whack some things are, and are reworking a lot of things from the ground up. Radical changescould beon the way, and I cannot stress enough the importance of a strong "true pistoleer" presence in that thread. I look at some of the posters there, and they aren't even pistoleers! I don't know about you, but that makes me uneasy. Thunderheart's thread on the In Concept forum: IC 1-10: Combat Roles; Pistoleer
Randonb wrote:
Great post! Bingchudiesummed it up pretty well.
Thanks Randonb, I was beginning to worry when this went relatively unnoticed most of the day...
The things that are being said over there, those are the things that are going to happen. Make sure your voice is heard.
Now more than ever this is the absolute truth
Radical changescould beon the way, and I cannot stress enough the importance of a strong "true pistoleer" presence in that thread. I look at some of the posters there, and they aren't even pistoleers! I don't know about you, but that makes me uneasy.
Makes me uneasy too. That is of course why I posted this.
I want holsters and duel wield too but I saw that overpower a lot of what I read.We did that with the first Correspondent Issues whena lot of us didn't know what they were really asking for and it gave the rest of theCommunity and the Devsthe impression that we weren't broken at all and could be moved to the way back burner of development. I don't what that to happen again...
I'll believe we're geting luv when SOE asks me to pay for it.
BeWary wrote:
Why should we bother? Will this be any more effective than the last 5 times they've asked us whats wrong?
Well BeWary, I'll assume that you're saying that for emphasis and the benefit of others cause you were one of the 69 people who had posted in there...
The reason why I feel this is different is because:
1. They don't have Mounts, Player Cities, or Vehicles taking up development time and it seems apparent that profession changes are the focus
2. They have either givenlove to Chefs, BEs & DEs or are in the process of giving it
3. Holocron is not involved (No offense...
)
4. JustG told us in his letter that Professions were a major upcoming development focus
5. The discussion isn't happening in a thread that has the underlying tone of 'Hey, we're thinking we should Nerf you...'
6. They have a new fancy Forum specifically related to Concept discussions for future Development
7. They said in so many words 'Speak now or forever hold your peace' in the aforementioned In Concept thread....
So again, please everyone: Read through the In Concpet thread. Formulate your thoughts based on what you feel and what other posters feel and put you BEST foot forward!