CUEmu - Thread Posts

Ciao

Sat Jun 25, 2005 2:01 pm

People say armor is better and others say innate is better. I will lay out what I think are the pros and cons as it pertains to combat only, no financial analysis.

Armor Pro's

Higher Defense vs Energy/Kinetic

UP to 350 additional health

Armor Con's

Lower Defense vs Elemental Damage

Innate Pro's

Higher Defense vs Elemental Damage

Innate Con's

LowerDefense vs Energy/Kinetic

Now, I know its hard to get a great set of Health "bonus" armor but Innate just takes some grinding. I personnally am using Innate now but am questing for the components for RIS so I can get the best set possible. Then I plan on dropping down to 2100 TKA for powerboost and Improved COB and say good bye to Innate.

Any other insights?

Roboute Guiliman
Melee Master
Rebel’s Bane

Fantomonkey

Sat Jun 25, 2005 3:53 pm

#2

I would suggest reading the sticky on the AS board about the way armor resists work nowadays. Its a good read.

Arcadias

Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:57 pm

#3

imho: unless you can ADK your armor (or have equal cash for new armor) = keep innate

(gnn[[[[[[[[[[~~nnnn~~WX9ggggggggggggggggggggg)

Arcadias Light-Fantastic n ~~Master Powers~~ cl90 Jedi

Arcadi Light-Fantastic n ~~TKM - MDoc~~ cl90 something

Arcs Light-Fantastic n Trader (Munitions)

musicguy

Wed Jun 29, 2005 8:04 am

#4

Keep the innate because it comes with additional health boosts too, AKA powerboost lol, which u don't need TKM to get.

Colonel Chivro Mano of AoR
You know its bad
When you start making Lightsaber noises
ALL THE TIME

Pikeman Archive

Thread: Armor or Innate Armor??