Pikeman Archive
Thread: Does fire dots incap a player?
Page 1 of 1
King_Lion
Sun Aug 08, 2004 6:19 am
#1
Does fire dots incap a player?
And how expensive will fire dot on pikes be?
i fell that all posion and disease will decrease in vlaue while fire will increase?
Ah but the biggest question i need to now now, does fire incap?
King_Lion
Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:00 am
#3
excellent (evil grin)
semms like the fastest way to incap a opponent is with a fire dot..i rarely hit them at action with my leg hit 3 (hardly dont take any damage)
fr00g
Sun Aug 08, 2004 8:46 am
#5
Then after they're incapped you can heal them and they get incapped again on the next tick 
AelricMistrider
Sun Aug 08, 2004 10:09 am
#6
fr00g wrote:
Then after they're incapped you can heal them and they get incapped again on the next tick
And get reported for being a griefer.
KaceAverrod
Sun Aug 08, 2004 11:48 am
#7
AelricMistrider wrote:
fr00g wrote:
Then after they're incapped you can heal them and they get incapped again on the next tick
And get reported for being a griefer.
Fire is a legitimate form of dmg and if they get triple incapped from it after you /endduel or whatever it's their own fault for not getting a doc there to heal them. Proceeding the initial hit with the fire you are no longer in control of the situation, the fire will burn plain and simple. This isn't griefing.
Rocacca
Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:11 pm
#8
just a reminder that if the target has full wounds in whatever poolbar, the fire will only tick for actual damage and therefor will not incapicitate. If the target still has possible mind to tick in wounds then he can be incaped.
you tend to notice that when you have a pike like this
http://www.imagedump.com/index.cgi?pick=get&tp=104836
Curxcha
Mon Aug 09, 2004 12:58 am
#9
Fire is a legitimate form of dmg and if they get triple incapped from it after you /endduel or whatever it's their own fault for not getting a doc there to heal them. Proceeding the initial hit with the fire you are no longer in control of the situation, the fire will burn plain and simple. This isn't griefing.
*sigh* Then i'd love to be told what IS griefing. If that aint a school example I dont know what is.
KaceAverrod
Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:56 am
#10
Curxcha wrote:
Fire is a legitimate form of dmg and if they get triple incapped from it after you /endduel or whatever it's their own fault for not getting a doc there to heal them. Proceeding the initial hit with the fire you are no longer in control of the situation, the fire will burn plain and simple. This isn't griefing.
*sigh* Then i'd love to be told what IS griefing. If that aint a school example I dont know what is.
GRIEFING is intentionally removing the enjoyment of the game from another player's experience. Acting with malice and trying to upset the person. Griefing would be to incap a player in a duel, and rather than /endduel, wait til they get up and incap them again, and again a third time. If someone getting triple incapped from a fire after the duel had ended can possibly in any way shape or form be constituted as griefing, it would not be in the game. By incapping a person via fire and then end dueling, you are effectively giving them the oppurtunity to ask a doctor for healing before they are brought back, and you are letting them know that you will no longer hit them because you ended duel. If they triple incap from the fire it is because they did not receive assistance. Griefing would be more along the lines of a person warcrying another while a cm throws all 9 diseases on them, or a bh getting a group together to hunt a jedi, and rather than the bounty hunter deathblowing the jedi, someone else does to keep the tef alive, then camping the corpse to kill them after they're rezzed, over and over and over.
Dynastar
Tue Aug 10, 2004 12:18 am
#11
IMO, its not griefing if you have a readily availble way out of it.
Page 1 of 1