Pikeman Archive
Thread: Gunman?
huh... I always had the impression that most of the regulars on this forum was happy with Gunman21? For what it's worth, I've never been ungratefulfor his work
SmuttMeister wrote:
quite the ungrateful job so hats off for that
Braglor wrote:
huh... I always had the impression that most of the regulars on this forum was happy with Gunman21? For what it's worth, I've never been ungratefulfor his work
SmuttMeister wrote:
quite the ungrateful job so hats off for that
/agree
I agree to what brag said, incase you guys got confused
Message Edited by T_Rikimouri on 02-10-2004 11:50 AM
He has received flack now and again from the ill-informed and impatient in our midst. Most people however agree hes doing a fine job.
*sigh*
Thanx braglor...i was getting worried there for a sec..
I think what happened is you said that Gunman had "an ungrateful" job. Braglor responded just to correct you that, no, we pikemen are very grateful. Others then chimed into concur with Braglor that we indeed do appreciate Gunmans efforts.
Nobody thought you were flaming, we just thought to let you know that Gunmans job isn't totally thankless. Perhaps a better choice of words would have been dissatisfying, problematic or ambiguous?
Just my thoughts.
Message Edited by Legwand on 02-09-2004 08:21 AM
hummm... I get those all the time... why is this only for veterans? I feel left out,tagged as a "newbie"
Legwand wrote:
Bless this edit feature. No more stupid errors.
Message Edited by Legwand on 02-09-2004 08:21 AM
wait... I know how to fix it, I ll just compensate like this:
Message Edited byBraglor on 06-46-2045 33:89 AM