Merchant Archive
Thread: TH, is there a reason you want to cripple everyone?
Page 1 of 1
Mor-Dan
Sat Aug 07, 2004 9:42 am
#1
At this leg of the adventure to impose such a cap is irrational. You will forcing some people to DESTROY half of everything they own. We already complain about not having enough space, and now you say that there will be a vendor item limit of 110, and that is only if you have MASTER merchant. Why are you doing this? Server space? Lag? Backend system issues? None of this is logical reasoning to impose such a strict limit. If you are going to cap vendors, then you need to expand other things like the bank deposit, houses, personal inventory, and wearable containers to compensate. Limiting vendors with such a visciously low number is criminal. I pray to God that you get fired and replaced before this happens and someone with an ounce of decency and brain power comes in to replace you. I don't care who suggested this, you should have have gone to bat for us. You should have made the powers that be understand that this cap is unreasonable. Get ready for another exodus...
Mor-Dan
Sat Aug 07, 2004 9:49 am
#3
BMarauder wrote:Loudly spoken, interesting opinion.
when it comes to TH and his "brilliant" ideas, i have no other volume level. i laughed thoroughly the day i heard he was in charge of "comminty relations".
Hey, TH... let me offer you some good reading. How to Win Friends and Influence People. You're gonna lose a lot of support if this change goes through...
TheRealTK421
Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:32 am
#4
TH doesn't ultimately make these decisions, folks.
Mor-Dan wrote:
when it comes to TH and his "brilliant" ideas, i have no other volume level. i laughed thoroughly the day i heard he was in charge of "comminty relations".
BMarauder wrote:
Loudly spoken, interesting opinion.
Hey, TH... let me offer you some good reading. How to Win Friends and Influence People. You're gonna lose a lot of support if this change goes through...
If you want to add your voice, that's cool. Just focus on the message and not the 'messenger'. To do otherwise is sorta weak (when, again, TH does not actually make the call on these decisions).
/bow
Respectfully,
p4Samwise
Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:57 am
#5
Agreed. Though it would behoove him to not announce them so chirpily when he knows that they're screwing us royally. He could at least pretend to be on our side to some extent.
TheRealTK421 wrote:
TH doesn't ultimately make these decisions, folks.
If you want to add your voice, that's cool. Just focus on the message and not the 'messenger'. To do otherwise is sorta weak (when, again, TH does not actually make the call on these decisions).
Page 1 of 1