Merchant Archive

Rodians and Bothans for sure cannot wear the Grand Healer's Robe, nor can males of any species.

Another way to try this to strip your vendors and start over might be to offer them a clothing item only the opposite gender can wear. IE a smock to female, and a maiden's dress to males.

I dunno how this would work removing accessories, though. I would suggest not putting any belts, bandoliers or backpacks on your vendors unless you want them to stay there.

You can get rid of the belt - get a crappy MK1 shield from an armormith before he/she deletes it, and put that on the vendor. Belt goes byebye

I think it only shows up on the client that the vendors are naked. I had that happened before.. my male zabrak vendor went naked on my cilent but he was still clothed on my husband's client.

Oh, the zabrak seemed to have chest hair.

Got any screenshots?

Here's what i did, I had a female rodian vendor. She was wearing a belted skirt and a sport bustier. Then I decided to give her a new clothe, so i gave her a Grand Healer's Robe. She rejected my offer saying that it doesnt fit her, and woala... all her clothes had dissapear but the boots she were wearing.

Im not sure whether this bug is repeatable or not. It made me laugh for a while.

gimme til i get home from work tonight and i'll post a pic or two of my Naked female bothan vendor. I handed her a smock the other day forgetting it was male only, and she got naked for me, heheh.

i swear she has nipples and is also... ahem... 'anatomically correct'

---

Feen_icks wrote:

i swear she has nipples and is also... ahem... 'anatomically correct'

---

And what, exactly, would 'anatomically correct' really be on a rodian? I'm pretty sure no movie or EU source I've seen ever explained the private anatomy of the Rodian female.

In terms of being correct or not, I assume that the rodian had the same private rendering as all the other characters. For those of you who remember when Thrawn had no clothes, he was not 'anatomically correct' , to put it cleanly.

i dunno about rodians, but my Bothan Female certainly appears to be somewhat 'anatomically correct' - assuming that it would mirror a human in as assumed way (regardless of what EU material there is or isnt)
Im sure it's just a join in textures or polygons that we arent expected to see but it is certainly perfectly placed to create the illusion of it.

Males arent 'anatomically correct' in the same way but the females can certainly have that illusion, like i said - when i get home from work this evening (still quite a few hours away) i'll post a pic or two of what i mean

Here we go, some pics for your viewing... "pleasure"

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~feen/nakedvendor1.jpg

http://members.ozemail.com.au/~feen/swg/nakedvendor2.jpg

enjoy

IT BURNS, MY EYES MY BEAUTIFUL EYES!!!!!!

Go get a twi'lik, though your right that texture line is in the perfect place.

---

Bethenie wrote:

I think it only shows up on the client that the vendors are naked. I had that happened before.. my male zabrak vendor went naked on my cilent but he was still clothed on my husband's client.

Oh, the zabrak seemed to have chest hair.

---

hmm...everyone could see my guild's rodian love slave that had lost its clothes

its gone now though *crys*

sil

Any vendor given clothes that they can't wear will become "naked". I had a naked twilek in my foyer and left her there through a reset to see if her clothes would come back (no). Everyone who came in emailed me to tell me that my vendor in the foyer was naked (lekku covered the jublies but everything else was wide open). Also, if you give a vendor an armor piece that negates clothes they are wearing, such as a chitin upper arm piece to someone in a bodysuit, they become naked except for that piece.

While amusing, I could see this getting abused and out of hand really quick. The default needs to be, in the least, underware....