CUEmu - Thread Posts

Haerb

Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:12 pm

FC calculations are something like Base Move cost + 1/2 saber Force Cost, so FC means nowhere what it used to. The difference between FC 10 and FC 54 on Dervish is less than the base cost of Dervish anyway, so the 44 FC difference doesn't quite double the FC. Big difference from when FC was a multiplier thing and each 1 FP was +5 FC on your Dervish.

((/ /(( o4((/((\ggggggggggggggggggggggggggg\
Palcus Meity = +3.27 standard deviations of coolness
Korall Meity = You aren't good until you lose count of your kills
Shirrin Meity = Awesomeface Commandodude
Jeston Meity = Elder Droid Engineer, crafter monkey extraordinaire
Mr. Roll Fizzlebeef = Spy so hardcore he doesn't care he broke up the = dots

hamhamthe3rd

Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:52 am

#2

i was just looking at the SAC cost thread and the testing was done with a saber whose fc was 23!

personally i think thats a disgusting and painful figure but i realise these are troubled times for some.thats when i wondered, what is the new standard for force cost?

mines is 15 and thats more than ill like it to be. i know ppl say fc isntall that important butthats not what this thread is about.still in longerfights, burning as lil force as possible has got to be appreciated.

yurylightmist

Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:53 am

#3

mine 19 with 630 dmg. or 25 with 655 dmg. i like to switch to the higher dmg one when fightin BH, and then go back to the lower one when pve'ing.

Chawncy

Sat Sep 03, 2005 12:53 am

#4

I'm with you, I experimented down to 10fc and 96 sac at the expense of damage.

" So instead of sticking to the thing that our players really love, we start changing it. And now we're alienating the players playing our game, losing our subscribers."
- Jeff Hickman

Jedi Archive

Thread: the new acceptable FC?