Jedi Archive

Thread: Saber block should be higher against 1v1, reduced against multiple opponents.

Jedi_Xan
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:03 am
#1

Saber block. How many of the older guys miss this little skill. Well, it was really borked in this whole revamp and the cu and crap, fact is, they are calculating it all wrong. Against a single target, saber block needs to be at like 80%. This is "realistic" (to coin a phrase) and something about what you would expect. Now, so that this little tool isnt too powerful, how bout we reduce it's effectiveness against multiple targets. Afterall, if one person is shooting at you, sure that is cool... but 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 people shooting at you, well, that is a whole different barrel of moneys there.


So, build up the valor stats so that at m defender, you can block 80% against a single target, then mathematically reduce the effectiveness of block for each mob that is engaging you. So maybe for example, 2 opponents is 70%, 3 opponents, 60%, 4 opponents, 50%. 5 or more opponents 40% and lower. The more opponents the higher the risk.



What are your thoughts?



Callale Xan
Imperial Colonel


Currently on vacation in Freeport. Please leave a message.
LairdJimmy
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:16 am
#2



Completely unnecessary.


Simple Mathematics:


Jedivs 1 opponent assume a base 50% block over a period of 20 seconds that 10 attacks are delivered. A total of 5/10 attacks will be blocked.


Jedi vs 3 opponents assume a base 50% block over a period of 20 seconds with the same base rate of fire per oppnent. A total of 30 attacks will be delivered with only 15/30 blocked.


The end result is 15 landed attacks within a 20 second period vs 3 opponents as opposed to 5 registered attacks vs a single opponent in the same 20 seconds. The constant that makes the combinedattacks of multiple ranged opponents vs a jedi more effective is the only constant, time.The linear scaling of block rates is more than sufficient since healing is purely linear as well, this scaling results in a simple ratio whereby the [damage after defenses* number of unblocked(and non-missed)attacks] - (healing rate) is the determinant of whether or not the damage may be sustained.





Ruthven - 4444 Guardian - Dark Side Force Master

The Lion In Winter


In the absence of orders, find something and kill it. -Rommel
WookieOgre
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:16 am
#3


85% pre-CURB meant I was unkillable to Ranged unless they had somekind of exceptional rifle. I will be the first to admit, with devs saying Padawans are not supposed to be all powerful.....block needed to be nerfed.


The only way the devs are going to introduce high block like 80% again will be with very high ranking Jedi. IMO if Jedi are truely supposed to be balanced to other professions block did need to be reduced to 25 (I even think less as +25 from xxx4 Defender is really goodwhen combined with +25 from MLS as NO other profession in the game can make a profession completely miss 50% of the time reguardless of Accuracy/Defenses).


The boat has sailed and is not coming back. What we should be asking for is some kind of reflect skill, that was something Jedi were actually known for in the movies and IMO wouldn't create balance issues (as long as it's a small percent chance, kind of like Critical shot). It can be a MLS skill that needs to be activated like Aura.

eternalfool
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:16 am
#4

In my opinion Valor should be in the LS tree anyway, not defender I can see why its in defender, its a 'defence' after all, but i really think that saber block is a skill for Lightsabers, lightsaber skills should be in MLS not defender. MDEF should grant skills that are of use to any template, as it is valor is only of use if you combine LS with DEF, most do yes, but there are some powers/def combos too, giving them a skill like this is pointless IMO.


Moving valor to LS xxx4 or MLS would not be unbalancing because of the offensive reduction it causes and would open a place in DEF for a more general defence skill.


My pre-conceptions about where valor should be located aside, I am of the opinion that the percentage chance to block should be increased. This is mainly because of the offensive reduction it causes. Unlike the old system where you could block 80% of incoming ranged attacks and still maintain full offensive power the introduction of valor means that you need to sacrifice your offence for greater defence. 80% block and 60-70% damage reduction seems fair IMO.


I also like the idea of reduced effectiveness vs more attackers, very 'star warsy'


Sorry for my slightly off topic start




M a s t e r R i f l e m a n M a s t e r C o m b a t M e d i c P i s t o l e e r x 4 x 4


-----GLORFINDIL THE GOLDEN-----


Dr o p O f f V e n d o r a t - 4 3 8 5 5 3 6 7 T h e e d N a b o o


Gohma_Manovich
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:17 am
#5

i read somwhere that during FRS saber block would be increased to 60... (and this wasn't a player posting)



GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma



Gohma_Manovich
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:18 am
#6






eternalfool wrote:

In my opinion Valor should be in the LS tree anyway, not defender I can see why its in defender, its a 'defence' after all, but i really think that saber block is a skill for Lightsabers, lightsaber skills should be in MLS not defender. MDEF should grant skills that are of use to any template, as it is valor is only of use if you combine LS with DEF, most do yes, but there are some powers/def combos too, giving them a skill like this is pointless IMO.


Moving valor to LS xxx4 or MLS would not be unbalancing because of the offensive reduction it causes and would open a place in DEF for a more general defence skill.


My pre-conceptions about where valor should be located aside, I am of the opinion that the percentage chance to block should be increased. This is mainly because of the offensive reduction it causes. Unlike the old system where you could block 80% of incoming ranged attacks and still maintain full offensive power the introduction of valor means that you need to sacrifice your offence for greater defence. 80% block and 60-70% damage reduction seems fair IMO.


I also like the idea of reduced effectiveness vs more attackers, very 'star warsy'


Sorry for my slightly off topic start






i wouldn't really think moving valor - lightsaber would be a good move its effectively giving m saber 50 block for free, in defence if you want more block you take that skill, just my opinion



GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma
GohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohmaGohma



eternalfool
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:21 am
#7






Gohma_Manovich wrote:







eternalfool wrote:

In my opinion Valor should be in the LS tree anyway, not defender I can see why its in defender, its a 'defence' after all, but i really think that saber block is a skill for Lightsabers, lightsaber skills should be in MLS not defender. MDEF should grant skills that are of use to any template, as it is valor is only of use if you combine LS with DEF, most do yes, but there are some powers/def combos too, giving them a skill like this is pointless IMO.


Moving valor to LS xxx4 or MLS would not be unbalancing because of the offensive reduction it causes and would open a place in DEF for a more general defence skill.


My pre-conceptions about where valor should be located aside, I am of the opinion that the percentage chance to block should be increased. This is mainly because of the offensive reduction it causes. Unlike the old system where you could block 80% of incoming ranged attacks and still maintain full offensive power the introduction of valor means that you need to sacrifice your offence for greater defence. 80% block and 60-70% damage reduction seems fair IMO.


I also like the idea of reduced effectiveness vs more attackers, very 'star warsy'


Sorry for my slightly off topic start







i wouldn't really think moving valor - lightsaber would be a good move its effectively giving m saber 50 block for free, in defence if you want more block you take that skill, just my opinion






Its effectively giving MLS 50 saber block, not for free but for 60-70% offensive output reduction.




M a s t e r R i f l e m a n M a s t e r C o m b a t M e d i c P i s t o l e e r x 4 x 4


-----GLORFINDIL THE GOLDEN-----


Dr o p O f f V e n d o r a t - 4 3 8 5 5 3 6 7 T h e e d N a b o o


Jedi_Xan
Thu Sep 08, 2005 9:26 am
#8

Uhm.... I think that this just went way up up up and over alot of people's heads. Judging by the responses so far.






Callale Xan
Imperial Colonel


Currently on vacation in Freeport. Please leave a message.
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next