Jedi Archive
Thread: Is SOE making you their lamb?
Page 1 of 1
Nicholastyr
Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:33 pm
#1
You guys keep blabbering about this starter kit as if it was some new revolution to SWG. It's absolutely nothing. I'd put my mother on it. You continue to put a conspiracle spin on it. Does it make you happy fooling yourself and trying to fool others that SOE is making Jedi a starter profession. Read the damn thing... Jesus Christ, you people are absolutely blinded by your own ignorance. This whining is getting worse than when the CU came out. Tiggs even said it was a mis-print... accept it, get over it, go play.
"Sequel to the award-winning role-playing game" Did SWG win any awards? (Serious question 
)
)"Cameo appearances from memorable characters of the first game" Was there a SWG 2 that I missed? (Lets disclude the CU 
)
)/end rant.
Message Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-30-2005 03:35 PM
WinkerPeeper
Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:06 pm
#3
Nicholastyr wrote:
You guys keep blabbering about this starter kit as if it was some new revolution to SWG. It's absolutely nothing. I'd put my mother on it. You continue to put a conspiracle spin on it. Does it make you happy fooling yourself and trying to fool others that SOE is making Jedi a starter profession. Read the damn thing... Jesus Christ, you people are absolutely blinded by your own ignorance. This whining is getting worse than when the CU came out. Tiggs even said it was a mis-print... accept it, get over it, go play.
"Sequel to the award-winning role-playing game" Did SWG win any awards? (Serious question
"Cameo appearances from memorable characters of the first game" Was there a SWG 2 that I missed? (Lets disclude the CU
/end rant.
Message Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-30-2005 03:35 PM
'Disclude'?
jedibd
Sun Oct 30, 2005 7:32 pm
#4
Tiggs even said it was a mis-print
While I don'tdisagree with you (who knows,its soe and anything is possible) Tiggs isnt exactly the pinnacle of reliability and she does work for SOE.
Message Edited by jedibd on 10-30-2005 06:36 PM
impcrusher123
Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:00 pm
#5
Nicholastyr wrote:
Yes, disclude.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disclude
ftw!!!!!!
Aureas
Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:11 pm
#6
Nicholastyr wrote:
Yes, disclude.http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disclude-WtfpwntMessage Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-31-2005 01:02 PM
Perhaps youshould follow your own link and read the meaning of the word.The way you used it does not make any sense perhaps the proper word you were looking for is exclude.
Nicholastyr
Mon Oct 31, 2005 2:59 pm
#7
Aureas wrote:
Nicholastyr wrote:
Yes, disclude.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disclude
-Wtfpwnt
Message Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-31-2005 01:02 PM
Perhaps youshould follow your own link and read the meaning of the word.The way you used it does not make any sense perhaps the proper word you were looking for is exclude.
On the contrary, it's being used exactly how I wanted to use it. Perhaps you should look at my comment with more of an open-mind.
ViciousTongue
Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:08 pm
#9
I think people are getting upset because AFTER Tiggs said it was a misprint, several more online shops started listing the Starter Kit. You'd think, if it was an error, SOE would have uh..maybe let the online stores know?
No?
No?
NickdeClaw
Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:05 pm
#11
Nicholastyr wrote:
Aureas wrote:
Nicholastyr wrote:
Yes, disclude.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disclude
-Wtfpwnt
Message Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-31-2005 01:02 PM
Perhaps youshould follow your own link and read the meaning of the word.The way you used it does not make any sense perhaps the proper word you were looking for is exclude.
On the contrary, it's being used exactly how I wanted to use it. Perhaps you should look at my comment with more of an open-mind.
rofl metoffl. Nicholastyr, you big liar.. you meant exclude and you know it.Aureas ftw!
Nicholastyr
Tue Nov 01, 2005 1:57 am
#12
Yes, disclude.
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=disclude
-Wtfpwnt
Message Edited by Nicholastyr on 10-31-2005 01:02 PM
Page 1 of 1