Jedi Archive

I would like to know why I am justified in killing a thug who stole a ring, But I fail for killing the theif of a pie.

Is the only reason for this that the Ring could still be retrieved where we assume the Pie must be gone?

I do not agree with these ethics. If killing to return stolen property to strangers is the way of the Jedi, perhaps it is a profession for which I am not cut out.

Any input?

no jedi would kill someone over a pie,lol

i only ever failed one quest because i miss read it

Message Edited by MysticOne622 on 10-28-2005 01:39 AM

Definetly not cut to be a jedi then. You must first kill hundreds of poor poor creatures in order to grown stronger in abilities, and to have a decent weapon you must kill Hundreds, of the endangered Krayt Dragons or genocide all Nightsisters you see...

the path of jedi is definetly not for you.....

lol try doing those trials as a dark jedi. You could fail just about every mission. I always thought the trial outcome should be different depending on your faction. Light jedi dont kill, and retrieve item. Dark jedi dont ask questions, just kill anything in sight and either keep the item for yourself or pawn it for creds. lol

A pie is not worth a life silly chef.

---

MysticOne622 wrote:

no jedi would kill someone over a pie,lol

---

No, but they must over a ring to become a padawn.

---

gRampz wrote:
A pie is not worth a life silly chef.

---

I didn't think so either. But a RING IS?

---

gRampz wrote:
A pie is not worth a life silly chef.

---

Well then again neither is a ring..lol

But the rationale behind it was not killing someone that stole food to survive.. but a jewelry thief is fair game...

---

BlueDevil34M wrote:

---

gRampz wrote:
A pie is not worth a life silly chef.

---

Well then again neither is a ring..lol

---

Exactly my point...

Message Edited by phaZe0 on 10-27-200510:50 PM

Message Edited by phaZe0 on 10-27-2005 10:50 PM

---

phaZe0 wrote:

---

BlueDevil34M wrote:

---

gRampz wrote:
A pie is not worth a life silly chef.

---

Well then again neither is a ring..lol

---

Exactly my point...

Message Edited by phaZe0 on 10-27-200510:50 PM

Message Edited by phaZe0 on 10-27-2005 10:50 PM

---

Honestly though from the team who has no idea what a lightsaber does I think your asking an awful lot of them to know the way a Jedi would act.....

---

BlueDevil34M wrote:

But the rationale behind it was not killing someone that stole food to survive.. but a jewelry thief is fair game...

---

This is a good point. I see it much clearer now...

---

phaZe0 wrote:

I would like to know why I am justified in killing a thug who stole a ring, But I fail for killing the theif of a pie.

Is the only reason for this that the Ring could still be retrieved where we assume the Pie must be gone?

I do not agree with these ethics. If killing to return stolen property to strangers is the way of the Jedi, perhaps it is a profession for which I am not cut out.

Any input?

---

Friend had to do the trials over 3 times due to this part....


PIE IS NOT WORTH KILLING OVER!

That is all

aother pie can be made but a stolen keepsake from a loved one cant be reaplced.

---

Sorotia wrote:
aother pie can be made but a stolen keepsake from a loved one cant be reaplced.

---

/Wise-Ass Ahh, but you heard the man, he said the pie was un replicable...

I understand now thank you all for your opinions