Jedi Archive
Thread: Anyone tested Aura yet?
Slash_DPC wrote:
Baciacca wrote:
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aura
with AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with aura
Message Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
If those tests are done w/ another jedi hitting you, then those numbers look correct.
Aura works fine for me as well.
For the rest of the ppl, stop complaining already, jeez
So just because it works fine for you, the rest of us should shut up?
*shakes head*
If anyone could test this and post data that would be great.
I tried testing it a bit but since i dont have all of Defender yet ( only 3 lines left to get in defender and im finished temp ) no point in me doing it.
So if anyone could get some data or put a clicky to the data that would be great.
With this change that means there is a smaller damage range now, thus meaning less damage will be mitigated from defense.
Mistwaver wrote:
On some things they greatly increassed min damage, and slightly increased max damage, but on grind mobs such as level 82 kaadu's on Naboo I was taking the same amount of damage post pub 24 as MLS/MD/4040 Heal as I was pre pub 24.
With this change that means there is a smaller damage range now, thus meaning less damage will be mitigated from defense.
Ah ok tyvm for that lol.
yeah i didnt have IMP aura until after Pub 24 so i couldnt really test T_T
Oh well its all good then tyvm for the info.
Any more data would be nice say in PvP instances
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aura
with AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with aura
Message Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
Baciacca wrote:
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aurawith AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with auraMessage Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
That sure doesnt look like it is working as intended.
Baciacca wrote:
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aura
with AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with aura
Message Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
lol tyvm for the data...
Baciacca wrote:
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aura
with AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with aura
Message Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
Is this in PvP or PvE? If PvE, what mobs?
Aura/CoB never was as effective in PvP as in PvE.
Aura works just fine.
The tests are more likely jedi vs jedi, isn't it bac?
Opith
looks like fa2 is better to have now than aura, seeing these results. especially now with the new ab resist crystal from mustafar.
Mistwaver wrote:
Baciacca wrote:
Test done a few days ago..
no AB, no FA2:
863 without aura
823 with aura
with AB, no FA2:
1092 without aura
1041 with aura
without AB, with FA2:
568 without aura
542 with aura
with AB, with FA2:
989 without aura
943 with aura
Message Edited by Baciacca on 10-27-2005 08:48 PM
Is this in PvP or PvE? If PvE, what mobs?
Aura/CoB never was as effective in PvP as in PvE.
The problem here is, that I saw similar results from being shot with a rifle too. (high min-max gap)
The other thing is, that they don't seem to miss any less now :-/
Something to calm a few guys here: Ab slices seem to be broken