Image Designer Archive
Thread: ID Macro?
Page 1 of 1
Hyperdiver
Sat Feb 07, 2004 4:49 am
#1
Could somebody please give me a simple Image Designer macro on that i'll be able to use on my self. I've done the first level manual and it bores the hell outta me.
Anywaysthanks for any help you can give me 
jedipsychofire777
Wed Apr 14, 2004 7:32 pm
#2
I've been grindin for jedi and arms are startin to get a bit sore (tailor, architect, ws and a few others all by hand) can anybody share some good ID macros with me please? If it matters, I won't be killing your market because I have an alt to use as my ID slave....Thanks in advance.
Ilere
Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:00 pm
#3
If you look up at the "stickied" threads, you will see a FAQ. In there, you will find links to the threads that have these.
Trianna-Xanaphia
Wed Apr 14, 2004 9:07 pm
#4
Here is the one I use:
// double slashes refers to my comments. don't include these.
/target [person]; //self or name of person helping you.
/image;
/imagedesignSetValue hair_color # //# == their current hair color.
/pause 1;
/macro [name] //name == whatever you call the macro.
//then just get ready to hit accept a lot.
//note that there is no AFK macro for Image Designer.
// double slashes refers to my comments. don't include these.
/target [person]; //self or name of person helping you.
/image;
/imagedesignSetValue hair_color # //# == their current hair color.
/pause 1;
/macro [name] //name == whatever you call the macro.
//then just get ready to hit accept a lot.
//note that there is no AFK macro for Image Designer.
jedipsychofire777
Thu Apr 15, 2004 4:51 pm
#5
Thanks a bunch Trianna, I'll go away now so I don't piss more people off ^_^
Trianna-Xanaphia
Fri Apr 16, 2004 6:59 am
#6
I'm always glad to help. I know how hard it can be to find a macro in a sticked thread.
Syzygy-Gorath
Sat May 22, 2004 11:02 am
#8
The new UI makes macroing impossible. The /imagedesignSetValue command was removed in minipublish 8.1.
Reiella
Sat May 22, 2004 11:31 am
#9
At the moment, it appears that any ID macroing is going to be forced out to 3rd party programs. Which isn't really a good thing, but it moves the burden of responsibility from "an ok game function" to "a bannable offense" at least...
Page 1 of 1