Game Guides Archive
Thread: Master Jedi on the forums will be rarer then in game :-)
Page 2 of 2
Azhnykk
Fri Sep 10, 2004 1:38 pm
#14
I really would not be surprised. Also seems like one of those line they would use in real life.
Arrya wrote:
I can just see the day... you are in game and get into a heated argument and you hear... "Oh yeah? Well, I'm a Master Jedi on the boards! So there!"
Limbonik
Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:37 pm
#15
I imagine for the most part now, we'll see nothing but 5-star messages for everyone. lol
LgEnder
Fri Sep 10, 2004 3:59 pm
#16
/me sniffs
I wish they'd reset all the post rankings from a long time ago, I used to be a jerk.
Jayces
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:46 am
#17
Based on the requirements (needing 4 star average) I don't think there will be many here,now there's an irony:-)
truewildman
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:48 am
#18
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far. But, I see your point, it's hard to hold on to.
But, I see your point, it's hard to hold on to.Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that. 
MasterAkujin
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:51 am
#19
truewildman wrote:
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far.
Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that.
not to mention the fact that you have to be a memeber of the forums for 4 years
Mallstrop
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:52 am
#20
The average star rating is much better than the posts rating, the ammount of rubbish some people post is stupid, I hate reading rubbish here, I like learning usefull things on the forums.
Oh well, this post will probably drag me lower. 3.4 at the moment. not too bad i don't think
Arrya
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:52 am
#21
truewildman wrote:
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far.
Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that.
Actually, you're only 3.5, the display rounds up 
Its very tough to keep a star rating high, some people will one-star for random reasons regardless of your post and it doesn't take many to bring your rating down.
Jayces
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:52 am
#22
It's harder then you think, if you look at your profile although you have a 4 star rating by the number of stars if you hover your mouse over them you will see your actual rating is only 3.5 which is unfortunatly what they base the ranking system on
truewildman wrote:
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far.
Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that.
truewildman
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:58 am
#23
Jayces wrote:
It's harder then you think, if you look at your profile although you have a 4 star rating by the number of stars if you hover your mouse over them you will see your actual rating is only 3.5 which is unfortunatly what they base the ranking system on
truewildman wrote:
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far.
Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that.
Absolutely. And the random one-starrers will hopefully be taken care of, to an extent. Thank you for the mouse-over info.
It will be interesting to see how drastic the system will be affected when there are more "honestly given" ratings to ones' messages...
MMRadiation
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:59 am
#24
Is the new ranking in place or is this some kind of bug? There are alot of new titles going around today.
SithGod69
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:59 am
#25
Who really cares?
Pat yourself on the back if you spend 90% of your life on a forum board.
I want the title of Most Evil Jerk. I deserve it.
Jayces
Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:59 am
#26
truewildman wrote:
(I'll probably get one-starred for this, but...) I have a 4-star rating so far.
Although, if they keep their promise to publicly label habitual one-starrers, we may see a change in that.
Yet they still continue to 1 star uneccesarily
It would be nice if there was a way of seeing who rated you or if they had to give a reason for giving the rating before they could give it
Page 2 of 2