Force Sensitive Archive
Thread: OK ABOUT THE GLOWY BUG
ZeAo wrote:
EXACTLY my point. If no one has gotten glowy by doing these badges, maybe they CHANGED the way to get glowy? What Rifleman Correspondant? What does that have to do with this?
Ackehece wrote:
ZeAo wrote:
EXACTLY my point. If no one has gotten glowy by doing these badges, maybe they CHANGED the way to get glowy? What Rifleman Correspondant? What does that have to do with this?
Because Tiggs has confirmed it was not a change in prerequistes but a bug and I passed it along to the community. She also has a post in the Dev Tracker to that affect as well.
haha, normally I tend to stay out of these types of threads, but this one was too funny.
Can you say PWNED By the sniper shot, lol.
Ackehece wrote:
Because Tiggs has confirmed it was not a change in prerequistes but a bug and I passed it along to the community. She also has a post in the Dev Tracker to that affect as well.
Is there a link to that comment? Myself and a few others have been unable to find it.
Can wehave Tiggs or a Dev make a formal statement about this?
Psyche_Innamora wrote:
Ackehece wrote:
Because Tiggs has confirmed it was not a change in prerequistes but a bug and I passed it along to the community. She also has a post in the Dev Tracker to that affect as well.
Is there a link to that comment? Myself and a few others have been unable to find it.
Can wehave Tiggs or a Dev make a formal statement about this?
Here
Message Edited by CuRhua on 11-01-2005 09:16 AM
CuRhua wrote:
Here
Psyche_Innamora wrote:
Ackehece wrote:
Because Tiggs has confirmed it was not a change in prerequistes but a bug and I passed it along to the community. She also has a post in the Dev Tracker to that affect as well.
Is there a link to that comment? Myself and a few others have been unable to find it.
Can wehave Tiggs or a Dev make a formal statement about this?
Message Edited by CuRhua on 11-01-2005 09:16 AM
Tiggs wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to let you know we are investigating the loss of glowy status and monitoring this thread.
Can someone please tell me how this says anything more than they are aware of the situation (investigating)and monitoring the thread? That statement does not confirm a bug, nor does it confirm that this was not an intentional change. They have tried to pull fast ones before, in very recent history, and we know they were monitoring those threads as well, hence the rollback. I used to work in customer relations and we often used thephrase "we are investigating"when we knew full well what the situation was. I hear it all the time in politics as well.
Is there another public statement by Tiggs or a Developer that I am missing? Because that statement does not ease my concerns in regards to this issuein the least.