Fencer Archive
Thread: Which one is best guys.2 diferent acklay batons
Page 1 of 1
Gamedoctor
Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:39 am
#1
THis is just sad.
The second has higher attack and lower speed, and you go with the first one?
*shakes head disaprovingly.*
The second has higher attack and lower speed, and you go with the first one?
*shakes head disaprovingly.*
SuiRyu
Thu Sep 23, 2004 9:16 am
#2
Gamedoctor wrote:
THis is just sad.
The second has higher attack and lower speed, and you go with the first one?
*shakes head disaprovingly.*
Speed on a stun bat means nothing. The slowest they get is still under our cap. Those 2 bats are pretty close. Imo id probly go with the first one and use a 16min/7max powerup to really cut that smallerdmg range, First better for melee, second better for ranged. Its really close though hehe.
Message Edited by SuiRyu on 09-23-2004 09:17 AM
Message Edited by SuiRyu on 09-23-2004 09:25 AM
Wynstick
Thu Sep 23, 2004 12:52 pm
#3
Question my fellow fencers.I am once again mastering fencer again though its only my second time because im dropping rifleman due to i dont feel like im in the pvp class i used to be in.For example were all sitting around dant mining outpost which it a prime dueling spot for a handful of us and being rifleman/pikeman all i can do to the melee stackers is dot them to helll or dizzy/posture change and hs3 till they die and its just not the same as it used to be so im going back to full melee template cause for one i miss fencer and its the greatest melee profession in the game involving the most skill and patients in terms of pvp also having great state defenses and dodge is great to need i say more.
Anyways ill get to the point.my friend is giving me a choice of 2 acklay batons both in good condition and here are the stats.
Acklay baton 1#
3.1 speed
156-206 damage
2.7 wound [all acklay are pretty much the same.
condition 899/924
Acklay baton 2#
2.5 speed
143-242 damage
2.7 wound
condition 797/924
Now im thinking the one with the 156 minimum may be better due to melee migitation but the other one has a higher max but only by 40 points which im wondering if this will really matter much.
which one would you guys take.any help would be great.thank you
Wynstick
Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:15 pm
#4
well thx for the answer guys i apprecitate it much and for gamedoctor i didnt pick one yet i just labeled that one #1 and the other one #2 simple as that and minimum damage is some times more important than max on my end but thx for help and ya speed does not matter at 3.1 or 2.5 cause fencers cap anyways.,
IxussFlamethrowerSpeciali
Fri Sep 24, 2004 12:26 am
#5
Gamedoctor wrote:
THis is just sad.
The second has higher attack and lower speed, and you go with the first one?
*shakes head disaprovingly.*
Your right, that response was pretty sad!
To answer the question,I would use both, the one with higher mitigation for melee, and the one with higher max for ranged, should provide a good balance.
Page 1 of 1