Entertainer Archive
Thread: FanFest Update: Entertainer Sulf-buff
Yeah, Kirk's whole reason for no self-buffs for entertainers was very similar to the reason he gave for IDs not being able to migrate their own stats - encouraging interaction. Furthermore, he really seems concerned that if they let entertainers buff ourselves, that it will somehow endanger our value in the game or hurt our viability as a profession.
I just don't see it. it takesa lot of skill points just to get even all four boxes in the technique tree to give a 75% buff, much less all the boxes required to get master dancer or musician. I really don't think that the fear that players will "dabble" in dancer or musician in order to buff themselves, putting all us full-time entertainers out of business, is valid. Oh well.
I must say, at the entertainment professions forum, Kirk looked terrified and traumatized. I think we scared him! ;-)
How odd. It honestly doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. The idea that people will spend all the skill points necessary to...oh...get novice ID to migrate their own stats, and enough skill points to go up musician and dancer to buff themselves...and oh...I dunno, go up doc enough to buff themselves, and then still have enough SP to take on a couple of uber l33t combat profs is absolutely ridiculous.
Someone *may* decide to dabble in maybe *one* of these professions for these benefits, but I sincerely doubt it. I'm also not sure why it matters because in all honesty, people do it with scout and medic already and it hasn't hurt their profs one bit. I also find it ironic that all of the afk'ing and buff botting is allowed to go on. And, those are the two things that are *truly* hurting our viabilities, usefulness, and income. I bet you we'd be much more in demand if afk buffbots were done away with and they let us buff ourselves.
Besides, I thought the whole idea was interdependency between *different* professions. I still do not understand or agree with the reasoning that *every* other profession in this game besides the entertainers are able to use their own skills for their own benefits, but we are not. It didn't destroy them, did it? I seriously doubt it's going to destroy us. The logic just seems extremely faulty, ironic, and a double standard, to me, considering everything else that goes on.
Message Edited by Drygo on 06-05-2004 11:41 PM