Droid Engineer Archive
Thread: Stacking lvl 4 components...
Page 2 of 2
Gribnitz
Wed Feb 25, 2004 7:42 pm
#14
Mobs seem to like to target Med droids when in combat. Tuskensseem to really like to kill your med droid. Without any armor they will drop in one shot, with armor 6 at least they usually have a chanceto run away.
EuroTrash wrote:
I don't see why would you need any armor on any droid other than Adv. Probot (Master DE item), therefore I don't use any armor.
duncje
Thu Feb 26, 2004 1:44 am
#15
The level 3's would have to be pretty decently experimented to stack equal to a level 6 module, which may not be possible in this case, with no skillpoints in the experimentation tree.
RasalTheWise wrote:
EuroTrash wrote:
Two lvl 4 med components make a lvl 6 - i.e. 110 Med capability
FYI, you can stack two level 3 med modules for an MCR of 110.
EuroTrash
Thu Feb 26, 2004 1:54 am
#16
Ok I looked it up on swgcraft.com - (no link from main page for schematics???) - whats confusing me is the Gen. Droid Module Socket CLUSTER (thats two modules right? Like 2 Lvl3 modules...) and Droid Service Module HARNESS - **edit** is that!?
Thanks.
Thanks.
DaggoWofle
Thu Feb 26, 2004 2:09 am
#17
Just FYI Level 3 + Level 3 doesnt = Level 6
Its Lvl of first item + Level of second Item -1
So a level 3 and a level 3 would be 3 + (3-1) = 5
But a level 4 and 3 will make a level 6 just fine.
Drashk
Thu Feb 26, 2004 2:36 am
#18
Here is the chart to figure out the rating/functionality ratio
Module Level Module Rating Medical Rating Items Stored Data Stored
1 1 - 3 55 1 20
2 3 - 5 65 2 40
3 5 - 7 75 4 70
4 7 - 9 85 6 110
5 9 - 11 100 8 125
6 11 - 13 110 10 150
If you experiment on 2 Level 3 Modules and get a mid to high module rating, you can stack them to acheieve the same a Level 6 module.
Kollos
Thu Feb 26, 2004 11:37 am
#19
DaggoWofle wrote:
Its Lvl of first item + Level of second Item -1
That's incorrect. It has nothing to do with the level of the modules, but rather to their functionality rating. Stack a pair of Level 1 modules together if you need proof. (According to your formula, it should have no effect.) Refer to Drashk's post for the correct formula.
Page 2 of 2