Doctor Archive

Thread: Schematic Problems

Zarlor
Wed Aug 20, 2003 2:55 pm
#1

There are several schematics we have that are messed up and i wanted to get some helping finding any others. So far I have the following:


the Infection Amplifier and Advanced Infection amplifier use Reactive Gas and Aluminum, neither of which has a PE rating, 33% of the Power for that component.


Dispersal Mechanism and Advanced Dispersal Mechanism Use Liquid Petro Fuel and Inert Petrochemical, neither of which has a Conductivity rating which affects the Range and Area of Affect on the component.


On the final schematics for all Enhance packs other than Action the schematics require Avian Meat and Reactive Gas, neither of which have UT rating which affects the charges available.


Are there any others?




Zarlor - Mesric City, Dantooine - Eclipse
Arissi Plains, Dantooine - Test Center
wynlyndd
Wed Aug 20, 2003 4:45 pm
#2

Not specifically a Medical Profession schematic problem, but the harvestor mechanism that medium and large flora harvestors require has been bugged for quite some time. So far, the only response has come from the chef correspondant, but this affects so many of us (Architects, Medics, Doctors, Combat Medics, Smugglers, Chefs, and I think Bio-Engineers use flora)



Nashara Navaboda
Master Doctor - Healer of Hangnails
Master Combat Medic - M.A.S.H
("You Know You Want Me on Your Side")
Lowca - Naboo - Inside of BABELON (near 0,0)
--------------------------------------------
DoD - Dealers of Death
Loony1
Wed Aug 20, 2003 4:52 pm
#3

I haven't verified this myself, but I've seen in a couple places that the schematics are only using PE from the organic components and only using UT from the inorganic components. While not specifically a problem with a particular schematic, it is a problem in the way the resources in the schematic are being used.


I'm trying to find some resources with the same OQ but with different PE and UT to verify, but don't have organics and inorganics that are similar enough yet to try.

TechnoAnimal
Wed Aug 20, 2003 5:21 pm
#4

The Enhance B Medpacks are the only ones (from A to C, don't have the D yet) that have Unit Integrity as an attribute. Could it be that the devs forgot this at the "attribute cleanout" in the big patch?
Zarlor
Thu Aug 21, 2003 8:08 am
#5

Unit Integrity? I haven't seen that one at all. I though all of the enhances needed Unit Toughness, though. And i probably ouwl dhave been looking at a D schematic to see that, but I may have just picked one or two Bs at random to check this. I'll try to see what more I can do on it this weekend. Please, anyone else that finds some of these let me know.


As for the Flora Farms, was an Issue under our Factory Problems issue, but patch notes today suggest they finally got it fixed.


On the UT -v- PE out of the same components, yeah I do have that down as an issue as well, but would really love to see some further definitive testing on this.


While these issues may never make it all the way up to the Top 5, theres's still a slight chance our Dev(s) might at the very least try to read our Big Listt every now and then and some of these issues might be quick or easy fixes for them. If it catches their eye, more power to gettign even these small things fixed up.




Zarlor - Mesric City, Dantooine - Eclipse
Arissi Plains, Dantooine - Test Center
TechnoAnimal
Thu Aug 21, 2003 4:26 pm
#6

I just checked the Enhance-B'sagain. If you look at the schematic in your datapad, the Enhance B's list not only charges, skill required, duration and power like the other Enhance packs, but also "Unit Integrity (OQ 33, UT 66)" under "Misc". But if you actually build an Enhance-B (I just tested it with Action), it is not shown as a property in the result and you cannot experiment on it. So fortunately this seems to be only a small bug in the display of the schematic, but doesn't affect the outcome of the product. On the other hand, it indicates that the data that are *displayed* at the schematic must not necessarily be identical to those that actually *affect* the assembly of the product...

Page 1 of 1
Previous Next