Doctor Archive
Thread: Why doesn't First Aid treat the On Fire condition??
Page 1 of 1
Groupal
Wed Nov 19, 2003 8:57 am
#1
Just like it does with a Bleed?
Wouldn't that make sense?
Sorry, I don't mean to inject logic and/or common sense into SWG, but yeesh.
Wouldn't that make sense?
Sorry, I don't mean to inject logic and/or common sense into SWG, but yeesh.
Little_Bunny_FuFu
Wed Nov 19, 2003 11:58 am
#2
ummmmm, because the first aid kit does not have a bucket of water in it? Overall Fire is not a medical problem, burns are.A buring person is not something first aid is ment to deal with, in essence first aid is suppost to deal with minor wounds, chocking, bleading,and resuce breaths.With this current system it leaves just bleeding to be delt with with the first aid skill.
AFHyper
Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:56 am
#3
Little_Bunny_FuFu wrote:
ummmmm, because the first aid kit does not have a bucket of water in it? Overall Fire is not a medical problem, burns are.A buring person is not something first aid is ment to deal with, in essence first aid is suppost to deal with minor wounds, chocking, bleading,and resuce breaths.With this current system it leaves just bleeding to be delt with with the first aid skill.
Uh, what about "stop, drop, and roll"?
Little_Bunny_FuFu
Thu Nov 20, 2003 7:21 pm
#4
thats not first aid, they teach you that inelementry school.
AFHyper
Fri Nov 21, 2003 9:10 am
#5
True, this is something taught in elementary school. That being said, we still don't have the ability to do what any 2nd grader can.
Page 1 of 1