Doctor Archive

Ah, I just do one point at a time.

---

Kakeemono wrote:

18/12

im with DarthXanthic on bria. The best buff packs around here are only 2700* power with bivoli

---

---

ratbyte wrote:

When you experiment on the whole row at once the result you read is only for the last point. Sosay youput 5 experiment points on 1 line and then experiment and the result reads failure, good, amazing, whatever, thats only the result of the the last point , not the other 4. Not saying that the other 4 couldnt all be the same, but you wont know that by what the result reads when you do more than 1 point at a time.

The advantages of doing more than 1 point at a time is the time obviously (its faster), and it makes the complexity lower, which means manufacture time will also be lower(if your making a schematic).

---

Can anyone confirm this? I sure do get a better result with an amazing success when I use5 points at a time than when I use 1 by 1 and get one amazing success.

I thought the same thing actually but it seems like I do get better results with an amazing on a whole line now.

So now I'm not sure.

---

Songe wrote:

---

ratbyte wrote:

When you experiment on the whole row at once the result you read is only for the last point. Sosay youput 5 experiment points on 1 line and then experiment and the result reads failure, good, amazing, whatever, thats only the result of the the last point , not the other 4. Not saying that the other 4 couldnt all be the same, but you wont know that by what the result reads when you do more than 1 point at a time.

The advantages of doing more than 1 point at a time is the time obviously (its faster), and it makes the complexity lower, which means manufacture time will also be lower(if your making a schematic).

---

Can anyone confirm this? I sure do get a better result with an amazing success when I use5 points at a time than when I use 1 by 1 and get one amazing success.

---

The above is not true.

When you experiment with multiple points they'll all have whatever result is reported. Easy enough to check -- amazing successes yield 8% improvements, great successes yield 7% improvements.

If you experiment 1 point at a time, you are NOT reaching the maximum potential of your experimentation points. (unless you're really lucky, and actually get 6 or 7 amazings in a row...)

Remember, a 7-point amazing = 8 great successes...

When you experiment on the whole row at once the result you read is only for the last point. Sosay youput 5 experiment points on 1 line and then experiment and the result reads failure, good, amazing, whatever, thats only the result of the the last point , not the other 4. Not saying that the other 4 couldnt all be the same, but you wont know that by what the result reads when you do more than 1 point at a time.

The advantages of doing more than 1 point at a time is the time obviously (its faster), and it makes the complexity lower, which means manufacture time will also be lower(if your making a schematic).

I am the opposite of most docs, I prefer going power over charges for buff packs. I am doing 11 charges with 24 power. But thats cause I usually don't sell buffs and can make runs of 50 crate counts so I will be ok in the charges area.

So to you it's acceptable to only add 13 power to the final pack (Comes to about 90 more points buffed IF you use +25 bivoli) and lose 650 charges in said crate of 50? Even not selling them this is a terrible waste of good resources.

24 power/14 charges

But I use 18/19's for my buff packs

all depends on what i am making

I make 2 differnt types of buffs.

ones for the coronet buffers: 23 charges/ 13 power - with the resources i have my paks come out 32|880|11k|89

ones for PVP: 23 power / 17 charge - with the resources i have my paks come out 23|920|10k|89


I just made a schematic for 21 charge / 20 power and going to see where that gets me

Hate to say that... but using better buffs for PvP doesn't change much at all, when people die it's because of mind incap anyway. /shrug

Hmm, not from my experience with crafting anything, meds, weapons, armor, speeders, whatever. The stated result only applies to the last point. Just made a stimpack D tonight, did 5 at a time got an amazing success, with a 4% increase with5 experiment points, hmm... Only logical conclusion is the other points were failures. Its not the resources, doing 1 point at a time I can get 7% increases with a great success results using the same resources and tools.