Doctor Archive
Thread: Enchancement D's. New official word or a screw up from a csr?
Just because doctors can craft Enhance D's prior to master doctor isn't an argument that supports unnerfing this change
Are you listening to yourself when you write this? Of course it is. Hello mcfly. Its a bug that they screwed up. Master doctors already buff higher then the rest with the same enchancement packs.
The Developers are adopting a mindset of preventing dabbling. Dabbling is the term used for getting nearly the best the profession has to offer with only a few skills in the tree learned.
This is the trend, it happened or will happen to CH. It is happening to a few more professions as well. I suspected when this came during the last big patch, it was a play balance issue and not a bug. However, as a Doctor; I didn't make any real credits until I was able to buff for a charge. So for all of those Doctors who are not Master Doctors yet, I am sorry. I hope they listen to the community and switch it back.
Well I hope they do listen to the community... I like it they way it is.
GOOD JOB SOE!!!
I'll say it again for those who didn't bother reading my posts with the official Dev responseon the issue. This was UNINTENTIONAL. That's not to say it may or may not be changedto be this way in the future (or to remain this way, as the case may be), but there was no planning and no intention to make the change. It was all related to fixing the ability to properly experiment on Ease of Use. As such they did put what they thought was a fix in the Patch notes not at all realizing the problems that would arise. It was unforseen, not a conspiracy. Since they did not know this was happening they could not have known to add it to the Patch Notes.
You don't do us any service by suggesting otherwise, other than to maybe get the Devs to not want to listen to us because we make baseless accusations.
Now they have long since admitted that they do have problems with making sure stuff gets into the Patch Notes and we definitely have some issues that are related to that very fact. All I can say is that this was not one of those cases.