Development Cycle Archive
Thread: AT-AT Test
But Looking at your posts, I think AT -AT's would be a good addition to SWG.
Yes the AT-AT should demolish people like sand paper, HOWEVER in the movie they didnt have LLC's and ACID Rifles etc I think that would change the battle a little. Especially any type or Electrical attack on them since it can short them out.
I just wanted to put that in
And if SWG doesnt put the At -AT 's in now they would probably when ships come out
Peace
Battle of the titans!
Nightsister Elder, Spiderclan Elder, AT-AT, Dark Jedi Master and an Ancient Giant Canyon Krayt Dragon.
only the 2 first got a chance to win, with their heavy armour and 100% resists. The Spiderclan Elder will outdamage the Nightsister Elder, but the Nightsister got 100% resists to all stats but 3.
Who would win?
And don´t give the AT-AT an AE like the spiderclan elder, that can use cascade of hatred for over 9000dmg.
And no 100% resists, all 100% resists should be removed and replaced with 95%. And fix flamethrower dots, so its not like watching a NS Elder die with 180K wounds.
Come on.. someone.. anyone! Did the AT-AT's fire wound right when it shot at you? Did it use the correct sound from the movies or did it use the crappy blaster pistol sound the AT-ST uses?
Thanks in advance 
Svengali666 wrote:
I wasnt there but I see some people mention pics... Where are these pics? I must be blind... but I wanna see these things for myself!
Check the TC forum. They pic links are in a At-AT sighting string there.
TouYuan's hit it right on the head. Small arms fire is meant for personnel not armored vehicles. It should be nearly impossible to take on an AT-AT without heavy weapons emplacements and anti-armor weapons like rocket launchers.
I agree totally that it would detract more from the gaming experience than add to it if TKM's and others armed with rifles and pistols can effectively fight an AT-AT without heavy weapon support. They should not be handled like an armor clad Krayt with lasers tied to it's cheek's.
TouYuan wrote:
Proposed AT-AT encounter:
etc...
i haven't seen them and i'm not on test centre but this idea sounds awesome.