Dancer Archive
Thread: Making Mind Bufss more acessible...
For one, we're not a crafting profession. While ideas like this would definitely put money in our pockets, I dread the idea of people buying crates of holorecordings and no longer needing to find a live entertainer.
Second, if the problem is finding an entertainer to deliver a buff, they can spend that time implementing those ideas that we've put forward to do so. Fix registration. Allow individual names under the registration. Allow us to plan appearance and advertise them. Place us in the 'find' menu (Nearest Master Dancer). Etc. There are lots of ways to implement ways to help customers find us if that is the problem.
Third, this is yet another way for AFKers and buffbots to make money while not there in our profession. Sure, it evens the playing field as ATKs now have a chance to sell buffs also, but in the end we'll have even MORE anti-social people joining our profession just to make a quick buck on holorecordings.
I'm not trying to shoot down your creative idea. In fact, I like the concept and the way it also involves other professions to craft these devices. It just goes against the concept of the profession in that what we want is a live audience, and anything that allows people to get healing or buffs without a live entertainer endangers that.
Message Edited by kirah_ashlin on 07-14-2004 07:51 AM
Your proposal, as stated, does even the playing field against buffbots. Since SOE is showing no desire to address the buffbot issue at all, and if they continue that stance, then I might support an idea like this. It does, after all, even the playing field. I would be against crafting crates of holorecordings, though. Let the artisans craft the blank discs in crates, but I would make entertainers record each one individually. That way we're still spending 3+ minutes crafting each one and it'll prevent mass flooding of the market by a few people selling them cheaply.
I'd still prefer the solution that they simply disable buffbots though, and return us to the way we were.
PoetDancer wrote:
I have a different solution to the issue. Why not just allow anybody who listens or watches get a mind buff? Why does it need to be specifically targeted or issued via group? We have always had some measure of control with /deny. This way, any dancer with sufficient abilities, be they AFK, ATK, buffbot, or whatnot can buff you simply by watching them.
Because we simply feel uncomfortable with a procedure that puts the owness on us to make sure you are doing your part. We simply want to dance, and let you /watch or /listen to us.
Actually this is how it was at launch, just no one knew it.We didn't have the modify column in the stats window, the customer got no message, it just applied and both the dancer and customer were oblivious.The buffs were weaker but just watching would in fact give a mind buff, most folks just never noticed. I think it was around month 3 that dancers started realizing that they did this and started working on how to use it to their advantage. They advertised its use, incouraged folks to try it (this was before denyservice and setperform) trying to get people see how useful it was.
The biggest problem was the AFK dancers. Customers would come in and purposely ignore live dancers. Why? They could get the same buff for free from Sally-AFKpants. They could get healed, buffed, etc and then go on their merry way with all their credits still in tact. Obviously live dancers took offense to this.
Apart from that, master dancers that travelled the globe to heal in remote areas of the galaxy were often treated as if they were afk. People could walk in snatch a buff of her and then go off happily making more money off his mission terminals. Our leverage to ask for payment for our services was nothing. We couldn't /denyservice, our only choice was to stop dancing, which hurt everyone watching including those paying for the heal. We needed to be able to control the buff's application to make it a viable service, doctors ask for payment for their buffs, I see no problem in dancers doing the same.
The /setperform system is very superior than just letting anyone buff at anytime without control. Without it we pretty much have no bargining power. I'm not saying you have to charge, I'm saying most of us do and we can't do it without controlling buff application.
Only thing I wish, is that it was more stable. Buffs randomly will just not stick causing me to redo the buff or just go without payment. I like the holo-recording idea. I always have. If it doesn't heal, even better. There will always be buffbots, I see no wayfor SOE to stop someone from buying extra accounts just to buff them.But if they are able to make money holo-recording or just use the holo-recording for personal use, perhaps they'll record at home and clear out of the cantina.
EsistDarkSky wrote:I know this is off topic here, but, meh. This got me thinking.Why not just make a tool that an ent would need to perform a buff? Like a holorecording... Something like that. It's the equivalent of Doctor buffs, you have to open your inventory and click on em, and they eventually run out. That's why you don't see AFK Doctor Buffbots... It would put a stop to buffbots,wouldn't it?
Yes, and that's the very reason why they won't do it, or anything like it. They will not kill buffbots in any way that makes it harder to find a buff. To do so would invite the wrath of the majority of their player base. In essense, they've opened Pandora's box here, and whether they like the result or not, they can't simply shut it again.
Truly, if they wanted to kill buffbots, they don't need anything that complex. Remove the /join command. Done.