Creature Handler Archive
Thread: The mith of baby frenzied graul unproven =D
Page 1 of 1
ImperfectZERO
Fri Apr 16, 2004 8:54 am
#1
Well just to give an update of rares i have confirmed it the baby frenzied graul does exist... i was one on dath last night while i was hunting rancor...... A woman i know im not going to expose her name because franknly bad memory... errr but she had one it was amazing cl54 it was crimson red it was soo beautiful...... just figured i share =D
BerentD
Fri Apr 16, 2004 9:22 am
#2
1. Screenshot please. Given the large number of people hunting them and the fact that they have killed hundreds without finding one, we tend to doubt around here unless seeing with our own eyes.
2. Frenzied grauls are CL56. If this was CL54, then it was a BE creation and not a real frenzied graul.
3. Did it have armor and 65% kinetic resists? If it only had 60% kinetic, again it was a BE pet.
4. If it was already an adult, how do you know the baby was found recently? Plenty of people have frenzied grauls in their datapads from last June-August when they were originally tamable. Just because someone owns one does not mean they tamed it since then.
5. The correct spelling is "myth".
ImperfectZERO
Fri Apr 16, 2004 9:26 am
#3
tahnkz fer teh splleing cerrectoin.....
yes i do have a ss
Jereck
Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:10 am
#4
lol... i swear some people just don't get it....
Don't insult our beloved FGs by calling some BE craptastic pet a FG. Now i know that not just any ole nub can examine a creature and get its CL.. but i know for a fact that anynub under the sun can see the creature type when they examine it. If you took the time to notice it, it said "A GRAUL" not "A FRENZIED GRAUL." Plus who the hell would name a recently tamed FG? Is it just me or does naming one take away from the name it is given upon spawning? 
I still have my webmaster from when they had ar2. I didn't name him then, and although it doesn't matter now.. i still not going to name him. Just seems to methat the rarer the pet the more appealing their "baby" name is.
Message Edited by Jereck on 04-16-2004 11:13 AM
NlMH
Fri Apr 16, 2004 2:14 pm
#5
Jereck wrote:
lol... i swear some people just don't get it....
Don't insult our beloved FGs by calling some BE craptastic pet a FG. Now i know that not just any ole nub can examine a creature and get its CL.. but i know for a fact that anynub under the sun can see the creature type when they examine it. If you took the time to notice it, it said "A GRAUL" not "A FRENZIED GRAUL." Plus who the hell would name a recently tamed FG? Is it just me or does naming one take away from the name it is given upon spawning?
I still have my webmaster from when they had ar2. I didn't name him then, and although it doesn't matter now.. i still not going to name him. Just seems to methat the rarer the pet the more appealing their "baby" name is.
Message Edited by Jereck on 04-16-2004 11:13 AM
Agreed, I have not named any of my rares, not even my Toxic Merek Battlelord.
Although the TMB is not rare, it is one of the few pet-worthy wild tamables that deserves the honor of retaining his breed and class name.
enigma_writer
Fri Apr 16, 2004 2:43 pm
#6
Highly questionable post
Frenzieds are cl 56 not 54. This sounds to me if indeed cl 54 that this is a bio pet.
But they are tamable as ultra rare spawns so it is possible. No one has yet to provide a screenshot to prove they have tamed one.
Milteck
Radiant
Quistalus
Fri Apr 16, 2004 5:26 pm
#7
Jereck wrote:Plus who the hell would name a recently tamed FG? Is it just me or does naming one take away from the name it is given upon spawning?I still have my webmaster from when they had ar2. I didn't name him then, and although it doesn't matter now.. i still not going to name him. Just seems to me that the rarer the pet the more appealing their "baby" name is.Message Edited by Jereck on 04-16-2004 11:13 AM
I personally feel that naming a pet seals the bond between you and it. The very first thing I do after taming a pet (Well, after storing it and running to a safe place to recall it) is give it a name. When I see "a frenzied graul (baby)", it makes me feel as though the pet is simply there to be sold. As far as I can see, those who tame rares and don't name them is either using the pet only to "show off", or to sell.
Yeah, I'm a RolePlayer at heart. I just don't like my pets having the whole unknown, uncared for identity aspect. Once I give them a name, it feels like they gain a personality of their own, and I feel much more closely "connected" to them. I see "an arachne webmaster (baby)" or "a toxic merek battlelord (baby)" or even the BE'd versions, "a graul", just thrown into battle against all odds to tank. I, on the other hand, prefer to be there with my pets, and often end up tanking for them. Unnamed pets are more like tools then companions.
Well, I rambled on a bit too much, I guess. I'll stop on this final note- I'd rather jump in to save "Shival" or "Akito" then I would "a rancor (baby)".
enigma_writer
Fri Apr 16, 2004 8:44 pm
#8
I didn't name my Bull Rancor until about 2 weeks after taming.
That was a pet I wanted to show off because of how hard I worked for it. I agree that naming a pet is important because it shows you care about them and shows how devoted u are to being a creature handler. I have friends who have retired from ch but still keep petsbecause of memories they have of using. I have a friend who has a tamed gurrek who he named Saint and though he will never again be a ch will keep the pet because reminds him of his days playing ch.
I do not like seeing pets named inappropriately. Whern I see that I feel its embarressing to the profession.
Milteck
Radiant
Blazr
Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:38 pm
#9
He has a SS, but doesn't show it. Heh, I guess you'd have to have been around a while to truly appreciate that one, and gain a hearty chuckle out of it.
marxo777
Sat Apr 17, 2004 11:36 am
#10
I don't even train my rares, Why use them when they really aren't that great in the 1st place. They are trophies and worth WAY to much to use.
IMO the best wild pets out there are the rancor and TMB. They are very common with good resists and ham. The rancor does decent damage as well. If they lose tons of vit its no big deal.
BTW Has anyone found that gurk that swgcreatures says is tameable?
Until I see a SS of a "non-fullgrown" FG I won't believe they have babies again. Screenies of full size ones mean nothing since they were tameable once.
Message Edited by marxo777 on 04-17-2004 11:41 AM
ImperfectZERO
Sat Apr 17, 2004 2:15 pm
#11
ooops uhh yeah i figured out last night it was a BE'd pett srry
Page 1 of 1