Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Mounts...
i think we should craft saddles as CH's..
As for giving non CH's pets.. they took that out in beta..
And as for letting others ride your mounts, i'm sure.. that they'll make mounts and pets seperate entities.. I will be very unhappy if a mount counts as a pet.. Then we could only have 1 mount and 2 pets out..
**********************************************************************
Where are pictures of things with saddles? send me the link
**********************************************************************
If you go to tatooni **however thats spelled** you will see the dewback in towns have sadles.
Has anyone thought yet aboutthe price a mount should be sold at yet? From theIn development page it says that dewbacks,Rontos,banthas will be mounts, but I'm sure there will be others that can be tamed as a mount too. For pricing we should keep in mind though that there are many types of Banthas, Dewbacks etc. We should come up with a list of prices forthe weakest version to the Bio-Engineered version, or should we set two standard prices Wild Mounts and Bio-engineered mounts. The Weakest to BE pricing would only work if non CH can use other commands like attack etc with their mounts. Else I say we price it the other way. So the question is How much should a wild mount be sold for and howmuch should a BE mount go for? Anyone have any thoughts?
Na'ga
If it's no to both, there's no difference between a BE mount and a wild mount other than the status symbol of large HAMs.
Again, if so, I think it should be based off noticable differences within a single species. Such as an odd colored dewback vs the standard green one, or a dappled gualama vs a plain one.(provided gualamas are mountable, I assume they will be) With faster or better looking species being worth more. IMO banthas are ugly. I'd pay more for a dewback than a bantha, even if everything else about them was equal.