Creature Handler Archive
Thread: 499 damage or not?
Page 1 of 1
Jak_Herer
Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:07 pm
#1
Personally I use my pets as additional damage on top of my own damage - 99% of the time I receive aggro off the mob as I do a lot more damage than my pets - The pets take very little or no damage at all so for this kind of PvE / NPC BH marks etc I would be interested in a very high damage and smaller health. Also I believe the minimum damage is also important when the final amount of damage the pet does is calculated - what would the min damage be on the 499 max pet?
Message Edited by Jak_Herer on 08-29-2005 10:08 PM
pugguh
Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:08 pm
#2
mid 6.5 K health is possible I believe with 480+ damage....darksidebio on bria made me one....cant log in ATM but im sure it was in the 6k range for health....he might be reached for comment on the boards he postsquite often on the BE forum....
pugguh
Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:09 pm
#3
499 max damage pets have the highest min damage as well....160+ I believe? damn sucks not being able to log in to confirm this for you....
Aerontako_Shretalon
Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:32 pm
#4
With Vigerouse Health, you can improve your pets health quite a bit. Even at these low numbers. However, a low health pet would benifit with that Frenzied Blitz or whatever it's called that increases your pets damage if it's low on health. Made a CL70 with 515 damage, but it was no longer callable after stored...
Gimpynoob
Mon Aug 29, 2005 9:59 pm
#5
You can get considerably more health out of a 499 damage pet if you lower your fortitude.
Aerontako_Shretalon
Tue Aug 30, 2005 12:48 am
#6
What would be yall's preferance? 499 damage would roughly only have 4.3K health. Doing some experiments on DNA statistics to determine what exactly hits 499 damage, but the health I'm left with is pitiful. However, there is a touchy formula released for a 488 damage pet with 5K health.
Page 1 of 1