Creature Handler Archive
Thread: One ultra-rare per planet?
Page 1 of 2
BlindTyldak
Sun Jun 06, 2004 9:48 am
#1
If you think about it, this would only make sense . . . we've known Dathomir's (bull rancor) and Corellia's (great plains stalker), and now we know Tatooine's (wild dune boar). I'm not talking mantigrue screechers and prowling gurreks here, which while rare plenty of people have, I'm talking the "you're lucky if there's even one of the threetamed on your server" animals. I'm going to hazzard a guess that there's probably one per planet, and we don't even know what they are yet.
Make sense? Maybe they're even sneaking one out per patch or something.
TivoTenook
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:05 am
#2
- Dathomir: bull rancor
- Dantooine: frenzied graul (?)
- Rori: ?
- Talus: mire marauder (?)
- Naboo: swamp stalker
- Corellia: great plains stalker
- Tatooine: wild dune boar
- Lok: ?
- Endor: arachne widow
- Yavin: ?
i put question marks next to Rori, Lok, and Yavin becaue I cant think of any creature that is near impossible to find. And i put question marks in parenthesees next to frenzied graul and mire marauder because those would be the rarest for those planets but the mire marauder says no babies and the frenzied graul is bugged
BlindTyldak
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:15 am
#3
I'm kind of iffy on putting swamp stalker there . . . but maybe its just Scylla. I see those pretty often and a lot of people have had babies. I actually deleated my two a while back because they were kind of common. We've got a good number of arachne widows as well.
Message Edited by BlindTyldak on 06-06-2004 10:16 AM
TivoTenook
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:28 am
#4
well, the swamp stalker is by far the rarest pet on naboo...even if they can be found easier than something like a GPS. as for widows, i consider them the ultra rare of Endor until all creatures under level 70 are put back ingame...then we will see whats what
BlindTyldak
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:49 am
#5
Aha, but how do you KNOW the swamp stalker is the ultra-rare of Naboo? Until a few days ago, we didn't even know that Tatooine had an ultra-rare. Maybe there's something else out there that no one has snagged yet? I'm actually leaning toward that, since swampies just seem to be too common to be put in that category.
marxo777
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:50 am
#6
Its not the swamp stalker, I have 2. I'm not bragging, ohwait, yeah I'm bragging but if the SS is supposed to be comparable to the Bull Rancor on rarity I wouldn't have 2. 
TivoTenook
Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:54 am
#7
well i know...lets ask the devs for some info! they're always very helpful!
...tivo thinks it over...
oh wait, nevermind
JMShunter
Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:03 am
#8
I was driving through lok today and saw a mire marauder. Believe it or not.
marxo777
Sun Jun 06, 2004 11:11 am
#9
JMShunter wrote:
I was driving through lok today and saw a mire marauder. Believe it or not.
Where abouts?
NlMH
Sun Jun 06, 2004 4:19 pm
#10
BlindTyldak wrote:
Aha, but how do you KNOW the swamp stalker is the ultra-rare of Naboo? Until a few days ago, we didn't even know that Tatooine had an ultra-rare. Maybe there's something else out there that no one has snagged yet? I'm actually leaning toward that, since swampies just seem to be too common to be put in that category.
As for Naboo, I'd have to say that the "Plains Hunter" is a better candidate for being the rarest creature on the planet, but as far as we know, it is still extinct as a tamable.
Bring this cool pet back.
NlMH
Sun Jun 06, 2004 4:26 pm
#11
JMShunter wrote:
I was driving through lok today and saw a mire marauder. Believe it or not.
What are you, Jack Palance? - "Believe it?.............ooooor not."
Although I've seen creatures normally found on Talus roaming the fields of Corellia and visa versa, To have actually seen Mire Marauder on Lok sounds a bit far fetched, unless there was a glitch in the spawning locations on your server. For now, I'm going to go with "ooooor not."
Yaurrada
Sun Jun 06, 2004 5:48 pm
#12
I thought bull rancors weren't too hard to find? I could've sworn I always hear of people going on missions for them....maybe I'm wrong?
Page 1 of 2