Creature Handler Archive

Thread: Rune, Vert, and my great fellow CH's

Pluto9Moon
Wed Mar 10, 2004 12:17 am
#1

Rune,

I made a plea to this great community of CH's to hold off the flames. I had hoped there would come a point where you or Thunderheart might attempt to enter into a dialogue to find some common ground. I believe most of us feel that we are combat, true combat. I also feel that for no other reason the Dev's feel we are pure support. We do not buff people. Do not compare our pets trying to get agro to save someone as a buff. Buffs work 100% of the time. Pets do not. If your plan is to keep us pure support then we must have support capabilities. But first and foremost you must fix the bugs. And you must explain the timers. There is no rational way to even suggest that a CH can suprise someone pulling out a pet and at the same time condone people switching from pistol to LLC in combat. Unless..... one is to believe you do want us gone.

Vert,

I call for you to step down as Correspondent. I do not feel that you are doing us justice. You may be doing great work behind the scenes. Our community needs a leader or two. I do not want the job. There are more eloquent people, and maybe a few that have less a temper. Freth, taloncard, and Tivo spring to mind as possible candidates. I want someone active. I am sorry to bring this public. It is time for fresh blood and someone a little more enthusiastic and spirited. I want someone to report back what he has told the devs we feel. I want someone to report to the devs what we feel. I want someone to say they are frustrated. I want someone to say that the devs clearly understand that the devs realize that we are against any time do to it being unfair. Vert, be human not some shadowed wraith hidden in the dark.

My fellow CH's,

I apologize. It seems I may have been wrong. The devs clearly do not want to communicate. We recieved our attention in December. It is not our turn again for a long time. Chef and CH down, 29 more professions to go at an average of two months. That becomes 58 months from now, just shy of 6 years before anything beneficial may happen for our profession. I by no means believe that the hostilities should resume. I do call upon each and every one of you to /bug in game each and every time you have a legitimate malfunction. Every time a pet runs because it is dizzied in combat. About every time I fight pikets 4-5 times a lair. Maybe they will get the picture. Report every instance of autostoring. Every time I incap after my pet incaps and it stores, at least 1-2 times a day. Maybe they will get the picture. Make sure you send a CSR Ticket as well. Maybe they will then get the picture. Report it in forums detailed in such a way that even a blind man could get the picture. Then just maybe, after the monkeys stop flying out my tush, JUST MAYBE then they will get the picture. My CH friends there is noone greatly sadder and disgusted at myself for being convinced something more would happen. We got tossed a bone with a fix. One that created new problems and needed a fix. Which created yet another problem and yanno what I have not pulled out my mount to check if it is indeed fixed. But only because I have become complacent with being fixed last. But starting today, I will pull my mount out more often. To /bug it and to hope that someday and maybe somewhere over the rainbow that someone will spot them and say "hey you know, just maybe there is a problem with CH".

Flamers,

I did not ask to be uber. I did not ask to be restored to day 1 god status. I did not ask for any spoilers or game breaking secrets. I do ask that we be told our role. Even if it is not what I want to be. Then I can make the choice to stay or move on.

Thank you,
P9M



Sign for Hutt Faction here: Hutt Faction

Not against broad changes, just profession specific ones (read as CH) that go against what we've been told in the past.
(I hired Trayson as a ghost writer for a good tagline)
Pluto9Moon
Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:15 am
#2

Vert,
Are you the one-star coward? I know for a fact you posted shortly after I did. You have no defense, other than a mystery one star? While in other forums it is obvious that other correspondents have an opinion, you linger around and restate what everyone else has said. Do you have opinions? Novel ideas? Any concept or agenda? Please do not remain hidden forever.



Sign for Hutt Faction here: Hutt Faction

Not against broad changes, just profession specific ones (read as CH) that go against what we've been told in the past.
(I hired Trayson as a ghost writer for a good tagline)
Wabit
Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:28 am
#3




nicely written... now as tempted as i am to let this thread try to die i'll toss in my spare change...


as for professions that work there are a few... BE, Rifleman, TKA, Chef, Marksman, Brawler (till Warcry2 nerf), artisan, WS, AS, Architect (sp?), Chef, Dancer, Musican, ID, Entertainer, Commando, Pistoleer, Scout, Ranger, Tailor, Merchant, Doctor, Medic, CM (ranged AoE's are a little screwed), and Politican (would we really know if they were broke???), and Swordman, (i think fender does too)


now the broken professions are... Pikemen, Carbineer (getting love soon), DE (also getting love soon)...


the ones that need attention are BH (needs to be stronger without dabbleing), CH (we know the problems there), SL (works for the most part but needs more), and Smuggler (it works but whats the point in mastering???)


now as for Vert stepping down, what can you expect from him??? he could be saying everything we want him too, as strongly as we want him too; and not know it... his job is to bring up our concerns with the DEV's, what they listen to he has no control over... i think hes kinda in a bind, they don't pay attention to him cause we are a profession they would like to see gone... and if he starts whining here on the forums it takes away the little credabilty he has for being a corrospondant... its a seperation thing...


but i would like to see a state of the profession more often... and a few other inputs...


as for what our profession is supposed to be, i like it the way it is... it leaves enough SP to easily Master just about any other combat profession in the game... yet it also rewards nicely for spending the 1 SP on master... most of the dabblers are gone... we have a choice of BE or wild pets, can hold 22 of them in the datapad... there is some quest type pets that can be tamed, most other professions after you master there is nothing else to do... to have a defined roll is not what we need... its up to each player to define his own roll in different situations... look at CM what is thier roll??? 1v1 a MCM will lose just about everytime to just about any elite combat profession, we can kill them before the disease/poision ticks... but in a group 1 CM can take out 50 easily...


now to be effective in this game requires useing all 250 of you SP... honestly with a group of 2 ppl just about anything in SWG can be killed without useing exploits... give me a MRifleman and a MDoc one of which having MCH, the best combo i think would be a MRifle/MCM and a MDoc/MCH...


but MCH is a PvE template... PvP its weak to say the least, outright useless to say the most... the MCH side of my build allows me to make more money on missions, kill the lairs 5x faster, and lets me solo just about anything in the game... i've ony gone through maybe a 50crate of c stems since before x-mas and most of that is when i'm krayt hunting...


join a group hunting endgame material (dunno about the geno cave, haven't been there), a MCH is almost always welcome (and getting harder to find)... if pets are used correctly there is really nothing you can't kill, saying you have a good group of a Doc, Commando, Master Melee Profession, Rifleman, and anyone else along for the ride (the fodder)... the Doc buffs, heals, and rez; the commando burns, Melee tanks, and Rifles add to the damage, everyone else helps the process along... now where the MCH comes in is when the PC tank is beatup/incap/dead... rotate the pets and the PC tank for healing... but when i say a good group i mean one that knows their what their job is... to make it even better add in a SL... but i digress


CH does need some help with fixing the bugs that we have... the autostore, pets not following, stupid time delays we have for storing/calling anything, some way to see that a special attack was tried but didn't work, and an honest list of what pets are tamable and the spawn rate of babies even if its a 1-10 rarity lvl...


Wabit




I can just see a "Wait for the Combat Revamp" and "Wait for the Smuggler Revamp" quote all rolled into one.
"Wait for the Smuggbat Revamp"
Smuggbat, I like that
Wabit
Wed Mar 10, 2004 5:31 am
#4






Pluto9Moon wrote:
Vert,
Are you the one-star coward? I know for a fact you posted shortly after I did. You have no defense, other than a mystery one star? While in other forums it is obvious that other correspondents have an opinion, you linger around and restate what everyone else has said. Do you have opinions? Novel ideas? Any concept or agenda? Please do not remain hidden forever.






well it wasn't me, i rarely rate posts, and always say if i do... stupid no edit button for me yet... only responing cause i was the nest to post...


Wabit




I can just see a "Wait for the Combat Revamp" and "Wait for the Smuggler Revamp" quote all rolled into one.
"Wait for the Smuggbat Revamp"
Smuggbat, I like that
Pluto9Moon
Wed Mar 10, 2004 7:14 am
#5

Wabit,

On the topic of Vert. I think you and I expect the same things. A few more state of the professions and input. In his tone of the community (now deleted thread) he asked us to calm down and make better posts. Which I do agree with in part. I am not asking him to whine or cry, just be more active.



Sign for Hutt Faction here: Hutt Faction

Not against broad changes, just profession specific ones (read as CH) that go against what we've been told in the past.
(I hired Trayson as a ghost writer for a good tagline)
sadnebula
Wed Mar 10, 2004 8:53 am
#6

pluto, you really didn't ask anything, you stated your opinion, Which came across as insulting. I was going to write my opinion, but I shall just say your post is a one star and deserves every bit of it.



Mondo Migill,

In through the Out door
Freth
Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:09 am
#7


(edit: typo correction)


I appreciate the honorable mention for a correspondent, but I don't think I could do the profession justice. Yes, I'm one of the oldest CH's (if not the oldest now) on Intrepid, but I feel my days are numbered. I lost the will to fight for CH a few months ago when we were pleading for a change. I tried so hard, I posted so much that I have no fight left in me to say any more. The only thing that keeps me a CH now is that I still enjoy my pets and I'd be lost without their help in PVE. I've been doing a lot of PVP lately (turned Rebel a couple months ago) and have learned how to have moderate success with pets. They still die a lot, but I can be a real asset in a group. Sadly, this isn't going to be enough for me to keep CH for the long haul. I do know this... if I drop MCH I'm dropping the whole profession and going for a fighter template of some kind, something to complement Master Pistoleer.


If/when I do drop MCH I will have made up my mind that I will not be back to the profession. I refuse to grind it out again. Knowing my luck I would drop it and there would be an announcement that the next publish had all of the fixes we've been hoping for. In the end I will most likely cancel SWG and move on when my interest in MCH and PVP wanes. I'm a broken MCH. I no longer care what happens to the profession, therefore I would be useless as a correspondent. I did my time, bleeding my heart out in this forum. I made my voice heard. If it didn't get to the devs with the passion we all put into it I blame Vert. This one person has/had control over the demise of our profession. This one person could've relayed how adament we were about changes. Has he done his job effectively? None of us can answer that for sure because we just don't know what conversations took place between him and the devs. What we do know is the Vert we've seen on the forum, the Vert that just hasn't cut the mustard in my opinion.


I'm beyond caring. I even own a bull rancor, quite possibly the first to have one on my server. This one pet carries with it what little pride I have left in the profession. I've achieved everything I can. I've had every pet I could want. What's left for me is to enjoy my current pets and use up what's left of my own interest in the profession, then move on. I can't say when the day will come that I'll stop being a CH, but I've been thinking about other professions and that's not a good sign.

Message Edited by Freth on 03-10-2004 11:18 AM



Fah-Mmm · Wookiee · Gorath · Master Creature Handler · Master Rifleman


Castillo
Wed Mar 10, 2004 9:33 am
#8


You posts deserve a low star rating (omg the worst thing that could happen! )because they just come off as thinly veiled attacks on Vertexon.


The correspondent program isnt some miracle cure to the ills of mmorpgs, even the devs have admitted this many times. I dont know where people get this idea that correspondents are super beings who can say "Hey the CH community wants Razor Cats as mounts" andone week later its in the game, or "Here are the top 10 bugs for (profession X)" and they all get fixed next week.


Last time I looked Vertexon wasnt Lead designer for SWG.

Last time I looked Vertexon wasnt Senior Producer for SWG.

etc. etc.


The correspondents canvass community opinion and give it to the devs. The end. I dont understand this personal hatred for Vertexon, he is fulfilling the correspondents role so what would be the point of change. Changing the correspondent wouldnt fix all our CH bugs.
Freth
Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:01 am
#9


I didn't say I hate the man. I just don't think he did a good enough job. You can look back on the CH forum at countless posts. Vert just hasn't been there to communicate with the community actively like we feel he should've been. Part of that communication, I would hope, would be answers to our questions. Instead, many were ignored and there was no Vert in sight until he had something HE deemed necessary to make a thread about. Countless "state of the CH"-type threads and zero results speaks for itself. If I were the correspondent I would make sure the community knew where the CH profession stands (as the devs see it), even if it meant me being dropped as correspondent and even being banned from the game, I would tell you all the truth as best I know it. This "silent" treatment just doesn't cut it. It's like some big conspiracy that they can't answer the burning questions because they don't want us to know the real truth. The devsmay be the ultimate blame for our demise, but I blame Vert for not being honest and forthright with us about where this profession was going to go. Silence seems too convenientfor the devs and the correspondents.


They got what they wanted in the end... to let CH die its own death. It sure has.


Message Edited by Freth on 03-10-2004 12:04 PM



Fah-Mmm · Wookiee · Gorath · Master Creature Handler · Master Rifleman


fantoq
Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:14 am
#10

Well Pluto I get to /disagree with you on this one...


Vertexon may not be the most inspired or verbose correspondent on SOE but the fault of the current state of the profession doesn't lie with him.


It first lies with the system as a whole. Correspondents are a very cute way for SOE to allegedly show interest in the community and save themselves having to pay CSRs to cover the forums or have devs spend a few hours a week on the forums. A conveniently cheap, yet unprofessionalsolution.


We only see a few posts from the paid "community relations" people and they don't seem to have any technical presence either. And occasionally a post from Runesabre, again more often than not a watered down PC answer.


I, as well as many others, have made point blank posts regarding bugs like autostore. And the silence from SOE on the subject is deafening. I can only conclude that they are unable to address the bugs. I'll grant that pets are complex objects to deal with, but at some point you grab the code by the horns and say if I can't fix it, I'm gonna make sure Iat least reverseit if it does happen. It's not the cleanest code in the world, but it gets you out of the jam you're in.


Vert's only as good as the tools he's given to work with, and I don't think SOE is giving him much of a hammer.



fantoq
MCH
former Medic
App. Carbineer
Society of Interplanetary Mercenaries[SIM]/ stargate/ naboo
Freth
Wed Mar 10, 2004 10:22 am
#11






fantoq wrote:

Well Pluto I get to /disagree with you on this one...


Vertexon may not be the most inspired or verbose correspondent on SOE but the fault of the current state of the profession doesn't lie with him.


It first lies with the system as a whole. Correspondents are a very cute way for SOE to allegedly show interest in the community and save themselves having to pay CSRs to cover the forums or have devs spend a few hours a week on the forums. A conveniently cheap, yet unprofessionalsolution.


We only see a few posts from the paid "community relations" people and they don't seem to have any technical presence either. And occasionally a post from Runesabre, again more often than not a watered down PC answer.


I, as well as many others, have made point blank posts regarding bugs like autostore. And the silence from SOE on the subject is deafening. I can only conclude that they are unable to address the bugs. I'll grant that pets are complex objects to deal with, but at some point you grab the code by the horns and say if I can't fix it, I'm gonna make sure Iat least reverseit if it does happen. It's not the cleanest code in the world, but it gets you out of the jam you're in.


Vert's only as good as the tools he's given to work with, and I don't think SOE is giving him much of a hammer.






The fact that any of these correspondents allow SOE to make them their whipping boy doesn't speak well for the correspondents either. It urks me in the extreme that questions aren't answered. I pay these people a monthly fee. It's like paying the government taxes and yet they refuse to fess up to contact with extraterrestrials. (don't laugh, it's just an example). Then we find out much later that the extraterrestrials are real and the government kept it a secret all this time. I blame the devs for being so blatantly unresponsive about bugs they should've been able to fix a LONG time ago. Yet they can write code for new content like it's going out of style. Seems like a double standard to me. I blame the correspondents for being silent and not telling us the truth. They're just as bad as the devs, maybe worse, because they are supposed to be communicating with us. Even if they don't know the answers the least they could do is tell us. Do I sound mad? Do I sound frustrated? You bet. I'm sick of the run-around we've been getting since the beginning. Tell me the truth, don't patronize me with more official threads of empty promises. It's high incompetence in my opinion.

Message Edited by Freth on 03-10-2004 12:25 PM



Fah-Mmm · Wookiee · Gorath · Master Creature Handler · Master Rifleman


KzinKiller
Wed Mar 10, 2004 11:14 am
#12

I have nothing but sympathy for those hardy souls who step up and take their turn as a Correspondent ... it is an entirely thankless task that SOE does absolutely nothing to make easy. What they can tell us is routinely constrained, what they tell us is frequently made obsolete by last-minute changes that SOE doesn't bother to tell the Correspondents about, what they tell us is often inaccurate because of SOE's incomplete and haphazard approach to documenting changes in their Release Notes.


They are truly between a rock and a hard place ... I refuse to be the hard place.


Thanks to all the Correspondents ....




*
The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them
Albert Einstein

CU-1 ... CU-2 ... CUL8R
CavemanGamer
Wed Mar 10, 2004 12:38 pm
#13


I haven't read everyone's reply to this, so maybe it's been said already...


but I'm pretty sure that I heard somewhere that Vert actually surrendered all his CH skills (except for Test Center) so maybe that explains why he's inactive and not very adversarial with the devs.



besides, I think the guy has a lot going on IRL... this is just a game, you can't expect him to treat this "correspondent" thing like it's a real job or anything... he doesn't get paid for this... you know?



What do you want from a correspondent anyway? someone who'll scream at the devs and make them understand our frustrations? someone who'll meet them on the TC and try to PROOVE how stupid some of the things they do are?


I mean, I dont know where you've been... but vertexon has never been antagonistic with the devs.


He's not that kind of guy.


Page 1 of 4
Previous Next