Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Ko-a -- PET SPEED?
Page 1 of 1
KzinKiller
Fri May 27, 2005 7:16 am
#1
Numerous requests for this simple piece of info:
Bug or working as intended that NO pet can keep up with a CH who is riding a mount?
You have blown off this question in your 'update' and ignored other requests for this info. Why?
Bug or working as intended that NO pet can keep up with a CH who is riding a mount?
You have blown off this question in your 'update' and ignored other requests for this info. Why?
TheDarkTrumpet
Fri May 27, 2005 7:32 am
#2
This is a really big problem because when doing missions, I have 3 cats I like to have follow me and I prefer to keep them out and not have to spend 45 seconds minimum calling them again.
Hopefully this gets fixed sometime.
Hopefully this gets fixed sometime.
zaal_swinari
Fri May 27, 2005 7:37 am
#3
ill add weight to this by asking yes why AGAIN is this the case
Ko-aIri
Fri May 27, 2005 8:14 am
#4
KzinKiller wrote:
Numerous requests for this simple piece of info:
Bug or working as intended that NO pet can keep up with a CH who is riding a mount?
You have blown off this question in your 'update' and ignored other requests for this info. Why?
Because I don't have any info to give you regarding this. Your sarcasm regarding my update is noted... Don't get hostile with me, as I've repeated many times all I can do is pass whatever info I get back and forth, if there's no info to give I don't just make something up. When I get this kind of attitude, I'm inclined not to reply at all.
As soon as I know something further, I will let you know. It's a potential candidate for the new #5 issue as well, along with a couple other things.
KzinKiller
Fri May 27, 2005 8:16 am
#5
That's all we want to know -- you've asked the question and they haven't given you an answer?
You avoid people having to repeat the question over & over by answering it once ... thank you. In future 'updates,' since this is obviously an issue of great concern to the community, simply adding that they still haven't provided you with an answer to this, but that you are still pressing for an answer, is quite sufficient to avoid people having to ask.
*edit -- btw, don't confuse blunt and hostile. Several people asked this question and got no response. As a Correspondent, don't fall into the trap of thinking that silence is better than 'I don't know' ... silence breeds suspicion and speculation, that the Correspondent knows something but it's unpopular and they don't want to say it. This has happened too many times to Corrs in the past. Be proactive on important issues, just say that you're still trying to get the information but have received no reply. Never fudge an answer on these things, it will really damage your ability to do the job in the long-term.
You avoid people having to repeat the question over & over by answering it once ... thank you. In future 'updates,' since this is obviously an issue of great concern to the community, simply adding that they still haven't provided you with an answer to this, but that you are still pressing for an answer, is quite sufficient to avoid people having to ask.
*edit -- btw, don't confuse blunt and hostile. Several people asked this question and got no response. As a Correspondent, don't fall into the trap of thinking that silence is better than 'I don't know' ... silence breeds suspicion and speculation, that the Correspondent knows something but it's unpopular and they don't want to say it. This has happened too many times to Corrs in the past. Be proactive on important issues, just say that you're still trying to get the information but have received no reply. Never fudge an answer on these things, it will really damage your ability to do the job in the long-term.
Message Edited by KzinKiller on 05-27-2005 08:45 AM
Message Edited by KzinKiller on 05-27-2005 08:45 AM
Ko-aIri
Fri May 27, 2005 8:49 am
#6
KzinKiller wrote:
That's all we want to know -- you've asked the question and they haven't given you an answer?
You avoid people having to repeat the question over & over by answering it once ... thank you. In future 'updates,' since this is obviously an issue of great concern to the community, simply adding that they still haven't provided you with an answer to this, but that you are still pressing for an answer, is quite sufficient to avoid people having to ask.
*edit -- btw, don't confuse blunt and hostile. Several people asked this question and got no response. As a Correspondent, don't fall into the trap of thinking that silence is better than 'I don't know' ... silence breeds suspicion and speculation, that the Correspondent knows something but it's unpopular and they don't want to say it. This has happened too many times to Corrs in the past. Be proactive on important issues, just say that you're still trying to get the information but have received no reply. Never fudge an answer on these things, it will really damage your ability to do the job in the long-term.Message Edited by KzinKiller on 05-27-2005 08:45 AM
Message Edited by KzinKiller on 05-27-2005 08:45 AM
No hard feelings... I thought you were being a bit more confrontational than you may have intended, plus my kid was being fussy while I typed so I was getting irritated.
At the moment, I've had to redirect my attention to the latest fallout from Publish 17 and locking creature calling from the Kashyyyk instances... /sigh. But this has been reported, as I said. I'll update when I have anything to share.
KzinKiller
Fri May 27, 2005 10:33 am
#7
Ko-aIri wrote:
No hard feelings... I thought you were being a bit more confrontational than you may have intended, plus my kid was being fussy while I typed so I was getting irritated.
At the moment, I've had to redirect my attention to the latest fallout from Publish 17 and locking creature calling from the Kashyyyk instances... /sigh. But this has been reported, as I said. I'll update when I have anything to share.
/salute
I know Corrs are stuck between the rock of player expectations and the hard place of dev deliveries ... don't get crushed!
Page 1 of 1