Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Jeassa please ban JoNaKu from the CH forum
Oh wait jessa don't come here too often I posted 2 identical threads to the valcyn and this board the valcyn one got locked, the one on this board still lives.
Message Edited by maddog0606 on 04-27-2004 11:35 AM
Pluto9Moon wrote:
Maybe Jon used to be CH but in this thread he clearly shows that he is no longer CH, http://forums.station.sony.com/swg/board/message?board.id=creature_handler&message.id=175078.
With that in mind Jon has many times attacked our Correspondent. And purposefully uses VPO and a substitute for POKEMON nickname towards CH. This is something we do not tolerate of the Red Names and will not tolerate of him.
He comes here only to incite CH. Not in the manner in which he hopes but he alienates himself from us and ruins the positive work many are trying to do for our profession. It is broken enough without him applying more negative energy to these forums. Many of us find it one thing to attack Red Names. That is there job to take some abuse. It is another to hate the CH's that have fun and bring this derogatory term into these forums with the sole purpose of infuriating the few CH's wishing to remain CH.
Thank you,
P9M
i agree with ya 100% pluto. his sole purpose is contrary to furthering the cause of CH. his use of VPO is a breach of forum rules because it is a derragotory term no different than using the "N-word" to describe certain ethnic backgrounds.
Pluto and Barb Agreeing again!?!?!?!??!?!??!?!!?
Hell hath froze over.
Gargi,
The Supreme Court ruled that some things are "fighting words". When they are used expressedly to incite people one should except the incited people to fight. Fighting words are not permissible in freedom of speech clauses. You may get it already but he does not. As long as he wants to use them, I will post the other side of the story.
wrong pluto. ur analogy is flawed cause this is *private* forum, not a *public* forum, so ur legalese is just wrong. ina private forum, the company does not need to abide by public forum freedom of speech guidelines and all its loopholes (ie fighting words). nice try though.
the irony here that i was subtly trying toillustrate that you missed entirely was this: it's ironic that you are trying to make the case that jonaku violated forum policy when in fact you had done so as well. note jeassa's official forum policy "All converstations need to be constructive and civil." Your statement "F*ck off and die" is neither constructive nor civil. it violated forum policy.
i don't mind jonaku's sarcastic rantings (because they prove a point in an entertainment parodic manner). what i *do* mind AS A PARENT WHO KNOWS KIDS ARE READING THESE FORUMS is when people use inappropriate language and are poor examples of civil behavior when they go nuclear/medieval on anyone writing "parody" they find offensive.
like i said, chill out. it's all good. ![]()
Gargi,
SOE's policy clearly reflects that trolling terms are not tolerated. Words such as Pokemon and VPO are clearly that. I was incited.
Terrific, they've fixed it so people can say Pokemon without getting an *edit*??
Just great...