Creature Handler Archive
Thread: The fox is guarding the hen house.
Old AD&Ders will recognize the saying "Never let the thief cook". It seems that it is human nature to take what you can where you can. Since most of us CHers recognize some will do us more harm than others we should without a doubt be skeptics when certain people gain more power than they deserve. Trust is a real issue right now.
In the promotion speech from Q3PO a certain person was recognized as fighting for professions. This does not hold true for CH. This certain person has done all he can to damage our profession. To include calling our pets cowards. This pet running away bug has never been fixed. He turns a blind eye to our profession because he wants us to suffer. It is very likely we will recieve more damage with this person in power.
I will concede the point that things may seem irrelevant to you. You probably realize that relevance is subjective and based upon a personal perspective. Since you only approach CH from your relativist point of view, it clearly shows that you have no problem with CH.
You are a danger to CH everywhere. Since you like arguing for no apparent reason, then you my friend are the troll. Since I can post here it means my account is still active. If my account is still active then I have a right to try to fight for what I believe is right. This may seem like a circular argument. It is fact, not. I wish for CH's to get respect. In order for TH to get respect he must give it. Since he does not wish to respect us, I feel no allegiance to respect him.
If he wants support from long time CH's he should and would apologize for his past transgressions. I feel no need to make my apology first or support someone on blind faith. Jeassa said we should give him the benefit of the doubt. I have not given him benefit since the nerf rumor started and I will not now. He plainly took our role away, nerfed our class and slandered us. He told the Devs what the community at large wanted to see but harsly ignored the CH community. This is our profession. We should be responisble for the change. Not the other communities. After all the world does not elect the president of the sweet ol' USA while not listening to the American populace.
You clearly point out that you like to arugue for the sake of argument. Even if I am wrong, who is the fool me for being foolish or you for arguing with me??
Castillo wrote:
So he used the term p o k e m o n,so what, so did99% of the rest of the playerbasewhen the game was basically Jurassic Park Online.
Message Edited by digiwrath on 07-14-2004 05:11 AM
BlindTyldak wrote:Well, this one should be safe then.Just remember, whenever something doesn't go right, it's all Snowball's fault.
Snowball is the name of my cat ingame and out.
Not nice bra
A. CH has problems, its true, but caling for someones job because you thinkn they insulted you somehow is not going to help any. All it does is get teh Devs to think you are an idiot not worth listening too. You don't always sound that way, but the more you rant the more foolish you begin to sound. Nothing you do will produce instant results. Ranting like that hurts the long term.
B. I'm not a danger to CH, you are. Youre actions risk alienating the Devs. Why would they bother reading our boards when it is a non stop tyrade of personal attacks on the devs and endless complaints? I know I wouldn't if I were them.
C. TH dosn't need your support P9M. Thats whay you need to understand. Your power is pretty much ZERO in this equation. You can't make anyone do anything. The devs on the other hand have lots of power.
D. Yep, I like arguing. Its a method by which I consider the opposing side and help them consider mine. I test ideas by throwing them into the lions den, and do my part in challenging the ideas of others. I'm not trying to win, just in it for the conflict. Its only foolish if it dosn't give me pleasure. You seem to want results for CH and so I'm trying to point out how getting threads locked and angering the powers that be won't help your cause any.
P9M wrote:
Gala,
I will concede the point that things may seem irrelevant to you. You probably realize that relevance is subjective and based upon a personal perspective. Since you only approach CH from your relativist point of view, it clearly shows that you have no problem with CH.
You are a danger to CH everywhere.
If he wants support from long time CH's he should and would apologize for his past transgressions.
You clearly point out that you like to arugue for the sake of argument. Even if I am wrong, who is the fool me for being foolish or you for arguing with me??
Witnezz wrote:
BlindTyldak wrote:
Well, this one should be safe then.
Just remember, whenever something doesn't go right, it's all Snowball's fault.
Snowball is the name of my cat ingame and out.
Not nice bra
ROFL, I was referencing Animal Farm.