Creature Handler Archive
Thread: Petition: MASTER CH'S WANT ALL CREATURES UNDER 70 TAMABLE
/sign
/agree
/thanks tivo
Aiseman <----- Still a Noob MCH
TivoTenook wrote:
I have had it up to here (points to the sky) with the ridiculous fact that there are undeniablly no babies for the following species, and we want them back (some never had babies but definately should):
- frenzied graul
- ancient graul
- merek harvester
- king/queen merek harvester
- arachne queen
- mantigrue reaper
- bark mite burrower
- bark mite burrower queen
- thune herd leader
- kliknik queen
There is no reason why these creatures should not be spawning babies and I'm sick of it.I might as well throw the bull rancor and great plains stalker on there too because no one on my server has one as a pet, let alone seen a baby of them...and I'm sure my server isnt the only one. WE DEMAND THESE CREATURES BACK RIGHT NOW. This is not about the debate between BEs and CHs, this is the plain and simple fact that these creatures SHOULD be spawning babies.
If you agree with this, sign here...if you dont, i could care less what you say. That is all.
Tivo - Master Ranger since August/Master CH since September
/signed
As someone who spent countless days and hours on Dathomir hunting for a surefoot brackaset baby with over700 kills (over 100 lairs), I whole-heartedly agree. These are either TOO rare or non-existant in many cases, and that is unacceptable. Rare, I understand, but freaking impossible to find? Too many low-level pets are non-existant, for that matter. They need to:
A) Increase spawns of the rares. Keep them rare, but not so rare we're pulling hair out from frustration as we are now.
B) Makeis so thatEVERY CREATUREunder CL70 has a baby...PERIOD. Rare or not, everything should have a baby that could be tamed. Not like we can have 500 rare pets in our datapad, we're limited to 22 at MCH and that's not much given how many different creatures are out there that could be tamed but can't.
TivoTenook wrote:I have had it up to here (points to the sky) with the ridiculous fact that there are undeniablly no babies for the following species, and we want them back (some never had babies but definately should):
- frenzied graul
- ancient graul
- merek harvester
- king/queen merek harvester
- arachne queen
- mantigrue reaper
- bark mite burrower
- bark mite burrower queen
- thune herd leader
- kliknik queen
There is no reason why these creatures should not be spawning babies and I'm sick of it. I might as well throw the bull rancor and great plains stalker on there too because no one on my server has one as a pet, let alone seen a baby of them...and I'm sure my server isnt the only one. WE DEMAND THESE CREATURES BACK RIGHT NOW. This is not about the debate between BEs and CHs, this is the plain and simple fact that these creatures SHOULD be spawning babies.
If you agree with this, sign here...if you dont, i could care less what you say. That is all.
Tivo - Master Ranger since August/Master CH since September
/sign
So far I haven't seen anything to disagrre with on here. I understand Having rare spawns, but some of these are very insame.
I'd like to point out to the purple poster that it's useless to collect rare pets for a status symbol when their stats suck canal water. What good is a rare pet if it isn't special in some way, or useable in combat? I could see it if I had some zoo I could place my pets in, but my datapad is too small to store useless pets in.
Another thing... I would've much rather had a rare pet for my Christmas gift than a holocron. We should've been given a choice---Holocron or Bull Rancor. 
P
Oops forgot to say don't forget those Kahmuriths on Dathomir 
FuzzyTeddy