Creature Handler Archive

Thread: Read the FAQ, The Issues, and the first 5 pages before asking stupid questions

zul448
Wed Aug 25, 2004 12:55 pm
#14

Well there is no reason to make a hate post about it that only adds to the spam. You have two choices:
1) Ignore the newbie threads. Just dont view them or reply to them.
2) Post and refer them politely to where they can get the information.

Pretty simple.



--Zul Bowfast - Trandoshan TKA/CH/Ranger--
hotmad1021
Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:27 pm
#15

wouldnt it be easier to not read the posts you know are gonna contain a question thats been asked thousands of times before? its sad when "ch veterans" are to "veteran" to help anyone. whats even more sad is when they post about the postings of the lesser informed. i hate to break it to the old skoolers but ch isnt the most easily understood profession in swg.
taloncard
Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:00 pm
#16



Nicee wrote:
In the time it takes you to whine and moan about newbie posts you could've given him/her the answer or directed him/her to where the answer could be found.





True but then they won't learn how to use the forums.

As a Professor I never just spoon feed my students the answer, I make them reason it out or look it up if they cannot reason it.




Severan T'iam (Valcyn) RIP 7/2/2003-5/8/2005.
Master Nerf herder (oops I mean CH oops CH is gone but never forgotten)
SWG: Quote: Grand moff Tarkin: The Jedi are extinct, their fire has gone out of the universe. you my friend are all thats left of their religon. Except for the other 5000 over there...


Pluto9Moon
Wed Aug 25, 2004 10:09 pm
#17

lol. keep this conversation going please. It helps the newbs to see it when they come on the page.


I am not "TOO" veteran to help anyone. I am pointing out PROPER forums ettiquette IS TO READ BEFORE YOU ASK.


That is how you learn to use the forums. Anyone defending otherwise is defending plain old fashioned laziness.



Sign for Hutt Faction here: Hutt Faction

Not against broad changes, just profession specific ones (read as CH) that go against what we've been told in the past.
(I hired Trayson as a ghost writer for a good tagline)
Kinjin13
Wed Aug 25, 2004 11:52 pm
#18






Pluto9Moon wrote:

lol. keep this conversation going please. It helps the newbs to see it when they come on the page.


I am not "TOO" veteran to help anyone. I am pointing out PROPER forums ettiquette IS TO READ BEFORE YOU ASK.


That is how you learn to use the forums. Anyone defending otherwise is defending plain old fashioned laziness.







I'm glad you pointed out that you're not to veteran, and are not above helping (or shouting). ) Glad to see you are keeping your sense of humour as well.


So not reading the 50+ pages of FAQs and stickies is plain old laziness? How about not being able to scroll past a question?


I agree with the Professor, to an extent. If this wasn't a game forum, which is supposed to have a friendly atmosphere, I'd be all for teaching the newbies a lesson. I to have a respectable profession, it also involves training. I suspect the difference with between being a professor and training people in the work place is that you learn about what is relevant. It's good to help develop people the ability to teach themselves, but sometimes it appropriate just to give them the answer. It also depends upon who you are training. For example if you are training management, that need to know how to find the anwers quickly with no need to fully understand how the data got there. On the other hand, somebody who actually does the work needs to know how to get the data in, and doesn't always care how it gets used. The relevance? If the newbie posting the 'stupid' question has restrictive time for gaming or surfing, do they want to spend it reading old threads? How about the person sho has just got the game? In there place wouldn't you prefer to be playing game, and think maybe a quick question would help? Or someone who has downloaded the game and it might mot be worth the effort to go through all the previous posts. I'm in no way saying that all the people posting 'stupid questions' and breaking 'proper ettiquette' think into these groups, and indeed some of them may be lazy, but just highlighting that you shouldn't make such sweeping comments.


I'm also disappointed the Professor seems to have forgotten the phrase "there are no stupid questions.....".




Kinjin13
Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:27 am
#19

The fact a question is asked over and over doesn't make the question stupid. )


I thought your annoyance was for people that asking questions that have already been asked (and having some unknown consequence on you) not that the same posters are asking the same questions over and over.


Oh, and I'm always ready to throttle the kids. ;o)
taloncard
Thu Aug 26, 2004 5:47 am
#20

There are no stupid questions.
Just sometimes an answer to the question that is:
Read the FAQ, The Issues, and the first 5 pages before asking stupid questions you dumbass!!!





Severan T'iam (Valcyn) RIP 7/2/2003-5/8/2005.
Master Nerf herder (oops I mean CH oops CH is gone but never forgotten)
SWG: Quote: Grand moff Tarkin: The Jedi are extinct, their fire has gone out of the universe. you my friend are all thats left of their religon. Except for the other 5000 over there...


Pluto9Moon
Thu Aug 26, 2004 12:22 pm
#21

There are no stupid questions. LOL. It is stupid to keep asking them over and over and over ad naseum. Even if you do not find it stupid, you have to admit that the 5th time your kids ask are we there yet, you are ready to choke them.



Sign for Hutt Faction here: Hutt Faction

Not against broad changes, just profession specific ones (read as CH) that go against what we've been told in the past.
(I hired Trayson as a ghost writer for a good tagline)
Page 2 of 2