Creature Handler Archive
Thread: PETITION: To Add More Creature Storage Space
TrandoshanDroidTech wrote:
Maybe we need to show it to them, if they see the number of signatures for the petition, I'm sure they'll respond somehow.
We've had petitions spanning over a dozen pages and the devs never even popped in to say: "Hey guys, we've already taken your arguments into consideration and our decisions must stand. We're sorry we can't comply with you or give you any more information. -Devs"
/sign
The devs want us to be walking pet shops... give us the space to be that.
I also think non-CH pets should decreased vitality at an accelerated rate... I believe the phrase is "turn over for the economy" 
I don't think we need more storage space right now, butwe will definitely need more storage space once creature mounts are available.
/sign
/sign
Rivek Fen. Master ch of bria. Quickly losing interest with all the nerfs
We definitely need more storage with mounts upcoming and every "Joe Shmoe" wanting a pet. Sixteen is too low for a MCH. I don't think anyone is asking for unlimited storage, buthere's a possibleidea: keep +2 at Novice (making +4 if you include the non-CH amount), thenchange it so that on each of the trees we get storage (Training, Empathy, Management) we get +1 at Level I, +2 at Level II, +3 at Level III, and +4 at Level IV.Finally, at MCH add an extra +6. A MCH could then store 40 creatures (4+10+10+10+6). I think that would be a decent amount for having your own menagerie and/or combat group, spots for taming for pet sales (if you want), and spots for taming mounts. We're still limited in what we can call out, how many we can have active, etc., but there's more to choose from, especiallyfor those of us who just likehaving different creatures for show, not necessarily for combat. I like having my Malkloc for scaring the masses, but I don't use him in combat...
Oh, and I think mounts shouldnot count against our pet storage (the ones we own for personal use, not the ones we tame for others) when they are implemented. Maybe everyone should get just 2 mount spots, CH and non-CH alike, for personal use (so you could have a dewback and a bantha, for example). This is, of course, based on the assumption that mounts will NOT be able to fight once trained to be a mount, either when mounted or on their own.
I am a CH, I'm not just some ignorant moron coming here to bash you guys. I'm obviously not a MCH, if you read my post, you'd have seen that. You actually think being a CH takes alot of upkeep? The only thing that cost money are stims to heal them, vitality packs (I've never used one, but I assume they aren't free), and the travel to get there (and back). The travel is no more than 5k total, it cost like 500cr to get 30 stim-Bs of quality 410 (On Kettemoor, anyway). They heal 700-1000 each, so that's about 3 times healing from incapped to full for 500 credits, which is hardly alot of upkeep.
You have obviously only tried healing low lvl pets. You know nothing about healing higher lvl pets or what it costs to heal them.
What, exactly, do you need more than 16 slots for, if it isn't for creatures to sell? (Which is the one and only thing people have said they need more slots for)
Try reading the thread. People have already said they want more slots simply because they would like to have a greater variety of pets to choose from. Or just to have pets for show. Increasing the storage slots doesn't add to how many we can have called at once. It just gives us a bigger variety to choose from. Myself, I'd like to have 1 or 2 of every animal. Most are no good for combat but I'd still like to have them. I enjoy the challenge of finding then taming them. It took me 12 tries and 4 incaps to get my dragonet. I'm still looking for a Grand Wrix (been looking for over a week now) and I won't buy one because I want to tame it myself.
/sign