Community Relations Archive
Thread: MCH's below CL80 being punished for being Masters...Why?
Page 1 of 1
Wavewoman
Tue Oct 25, 2005 11:46 pm
#1
Simple question and although I don't really expect to see any DEV replies, is still feel compelled to ask.
Why would any profession be restricted to a reward, an ability or their due right as a "master" just because they do NOT have class status from any other UNRELATED professions?
This is exactly the case in point with the new expansion and "content". The bone that has been thrown to placate MCH's with the new "taming necklace" reward on ToOW. ALL Master Creature Handlers are not equal: any below class 80 are being punished, (and you can't get 80 on just CH alone btw) we're cast aside and basically shown that they do not count as a master of their trade.
Nevermind the grind, nevermind the SP consumption, nevermind the devotion to a trade that may actually be FUN (a few of us may remember what that is from the old days). If you are NOT a double combat zombie then to SOE you do not deserve to play on an even field with the rest of the galaxy.
I would like to know how any other profession would handle the disadvantage.
My main account is a MCH/MBE and I have never wanted to be anything else. Pera is good at what she does has turned the other cheek with nerfs to pets, shifts in DNA from BE fudge-ups on the Dev side, critical fails and being excluded from crafting patches.....and virtually relearned an entire trade. CH has been the constant if not the powerhouse.
SOE can please answer to WHY? why is a master not qualified to be "master"?
Just because there is some diversity in the game still? Is this another push to eliminate all support toons? Or was it just another in the long list of seemingly thoughtless oversights in developement towards a "better" SWG?
Looking for answers and wondering if this is really another intentional slap in the face. If not then what can be done to even the playing field in this "balanced system".
Page 1 of 1