Commando Archive
Thread: A nice Flame thrower...thank you slice gods
Page 1 of 2
bhtm29
Thu Mar 03, 2005 3:50 am
#1
just made a couple of flamethrowers tonite with some -1.404 tissue and they came out as follows
2.5 speed
492-933 damage
and to top it all off i god speed slices on both of them so they are now 1.7 seconds and 2.0 seconds
Just curious how those numbers relate to some of the better flame throwers out there. I know it depends on the server but im thinking the 1.7 speeed might be worthy of anti decay kit what do you all think?
BTW corbantis server
Lok-Ranger
Thu Mar 03, 2005 4:46 am
#2
dude that isn't that bad/good.... I have a 2.6 483-910 and a 4.7 588-1104... plus 2 in between that... its not that good...
bhtm29
Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:10 am
#3
Well in all honesty this is an extremely good flame thrower because of the simple fact that its all about Damage per second and how fast you can spam flame 2 single. the only way to get higher dps with any other flame thrower is to have a FASTER flamethrower. Max damage is not as important since no commando can speed cap heavy weapons. Just FYI. Im just wondering if there is a faster one on our server and so on.
joe97
Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:15 am
#4
Did lok-ranger even read the post? his flamers are horrible, but yeah to the topic creator that's a good one
Joee
EnFERn0
Thu Mar 03, 2005 5:26 am
#5
The 1.7sec 933dmg flamer is really top of theline.
If heavy use, ADK it. If occational use, save the kit for the CU.
Who know, maybe we won' be purly dependant on speed after it.
Samun
Thu Mar 03, 2005 6:43 am
#6
EnFERn0 wrote:
The 1.7sec 933dmg flamer is really top of theline.
If heavy use, ADK it. If occational use, save the kit for the CU.
Who know, maybe we won' be purly dependant on speed after it.
/agree
that 1.7 speed is rockin. Beautiful weapon... take care of it!
[ PHO | Kauri ]
Tuscanspeed
Thu Mar 03, 2005 7:06 am
#7
Lok-Ranger wrote:
dude that isn't that bad/good.... I have a 2.6 483-910 and a 4.7 588-1104... plus 2 in between that... its not that good...
take the crack pipe AWAY from your mouth, you've had enough.
if you hunt much at all, 1.7 is antidecay worthy.
definatley top notch.
DarkainHellfire
Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:25 am
#9
Samun wrote:
EnFERn0 wrote:
The 1.7sec 933dmg flamer is really top of theline.
If heavy use, ADK it. If occational use, save the kit for the CU.
Who know, maybe we won' be purly dependant on speed after it.
/agree
that 1.7 speed is rockin. Beautiful weapon... take care of it!
Hell yeah man...gratz on that =) Excellent weapon =)
Latenighter
Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:15 am
#10
Only 1.7 speed? Gee, that's pretty weak. You should just give it away. I have a collection of old useless weapons like that. You can give it to me and I'll put it in the museum for you. 
Jessalyn_Bohicat
Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:20 am
#11
Tuscanspeed wrote:
Lok-Ranger wrote:dude that isn't that bad/good.... I have a 2.6 483-910 and a 4.7 588-1104... plus 2 in between that... its not that good...take the crack pipe AWAY from your mouth, you've had enough.
if you hunt much at all, 1.7 is antidecay worthy.
definatley top notch.
LOL
yeah thats a nice one =) adk it for sure if youre gonna be out huntin and one shottin jedi with it!!
StarNick
Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:33 am
#12
Speed matters for Commando atm....thats a very nice flamer I must say, got one similiar but at 2.7 speed.
Faster flamethrowers should prove to be interesting in testing during the Sandbox...we don't know yet if Commandos will do better with faster Hvy Weapons or with higher damage ones yet, gotta keep that in mind now... 
bhtm29
Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:08 pm
#13
Well i guess i wont ever get to test it. After vast interest on the trade boards i have decided to put it up for auction. I let someone else have all the fun and be content with my 2.0 speed flamer
Page 1 of 2