Commando Archive
Thread: Heavy Weapons 3 enough ???
Page 1 of 1
Ibexguy
Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:15 am
#1
Im a Master Smuggler and Master TKA. I could go for the triple elite and get Master Pistoleer but I am drawn toward the Rocket Launcher for killing ATST and perhaps ATAT someday. Is using a Rocket Launcher with Heavy Weapons tree 1,2, or 3 enought, or should I drop some Smuggler skills to get more commando. Or just go with the low or no armor piecing pistoleer profession?
Thx for any input
LaoTzu of the Lost on Gorath
Skeptic666
Wed Aug 11, 2004 8:34 am
#2
hehe you miss like a sob even at master. Make sure to take SNow cake. And right now every other profession can out damage us against AT-STS between the shots and delays and the insane price of Rocket Launchers you can pot shot it with a riffle or a Hammer for more damage
Not a great idea In my opinion. You would do better to take novice and what pistols you can to give your Launcher pistol more mods and Last ditch or what not will give you more damage then a rl I hear they kill turrets and at-sts pretty good
Ibexguy
Wed Aug 11, 2004 4:59 pm
#3
It seems like a Commandos job should be taking down turrets, ATST and killing large things with Rockets and Grenades. Guess my answer is to grind out the Master Pistoleer tree and hope they add duel wield guns and some sick pistols. Thx
LaoTzu of the Lost on Gorath
Thobbit
Wed Aug 11, 2004 6:35 pm
#4
lol you would think we were good for turrets and what have you. but from my xp Ive seen more non-commandos take them out. I myself have never done it.. but than again due to planning and being the only commando around I was always kept alive for base take overs. I never realy got the chance to take out turrets. If you couls I would suggest doing pistols with the commando LP the blast damage does work against them.
Grakis
Wed Aug 11, 2004 10:35 pm
#5
If I see one more person say that a focus of the commando should be combatting AT-STs, I'm going to go berserk. We aren't all rebels, people!
And even if we were, the whole turret and AT-ST thing wouldn't be plausible anyways. They simply aren't that prevalent in combat. You can't try to dedicate such a skill-point intensive profession to something so obscure.
Ster
Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:03 am
#6
Grakis wrote:
If I see one more person say that a focus of the commando should be combatting AT-STs, I'm going to go berserk. We aren't all rebels, people!
And even if we were, the whole turret and AT-ST thing wouldn't be plausible anyways. They simply aren't that prevalent in combat. You can't try to dedicate such a skill-point intensive profession to something so obscure.
Agreed. It should be one benefit, but not the driving force. Of course I am rebel so I do use them on the AT-STs.
Page 1 of 1