Commando Archive

Thread: History of the Combat Revamp revisited

Novock
Wed Dec 08, 2004 11:01 am
#1


Since the original was delted here ya guys go. As far as I know there is nothing against SOE policy in quoting TH's comments so if it disappears again we know why. they are simply trying to hide it.


***********************************************************************


TH 12/8/03


There is content in the works, GCW stuff, the combat revamp...


************************************************************************


TH 12/23/03


I know a bunch of this is in development, but it really is . The combat system is being rebalanced and going forward, its important to get your critical issues to klawlegna so we can act on it. The big bottleneck is communication and after the holidays, a lot of this will be ironed out and smoother.


Instead of "fixing this" and "tweaking" that and ending up with a wobbly 4 legged table because so many number are over-tweaked, we are just revamping the system, but that takes longer.


************************************************************************


TH 12/23/03
The short answer is that these items will be taken care of in the weapons balance. Specials, weapon stratification and the like will all be accounted for
(what ever happened to the weapons balance????)


************************************************************************


TH 12/23/03
I could, but everything is getting revamped. Id be more interested in hearing what you folks have to say on how you WANT it to stack since we are doing the combat balance.


************************************************************************


TH 12/23/03
If its big, its coming in the revamp and the Combat Balance


************************************************************************


TH 1/16/04 (does this one sound familar)
We are going to be revamping PvP, but in the meantime, we have to make some killer fixes to keep what is in live now, fun.


************************************************************************


TH 1/23/04
The combat balance is near and dear to my heart as are all player issues. I just have to juggle time, manpower and scheduling as well. What I do is I keep track of all the issues, label them and sort them. That way when I go to Blair, JustG and Runesabre and say "players need this fixed", its based on how many players are being effected.


The combat balance alone is the single largest player issue. It encompases about 34% of the Correspondent issues and much of the pain combat players are having. Pikemen, carbineers, commando heavy weapons, the cost of specials, HAM costs, all of that will be better when the combat balance is done.


The thing to remember is that because the combat balance touches so many other systems in the game, its going to take a while. The team thats working on this is working very hard and thats the best I can offer.


**************************************************************************


TH 2/6/04 (holy cow...the combat revamp is mentioned INFRONT of the jedi revamp)
2. For PvP and Base battle folks, your time is coming. Once we get past the Combat Balance and the Jedi Revamp, the PvP balance is scheduled. Its a multi-publish update (roughly planned atm) where will consider battlefield possibilities, PvP upgrades and so on.


*************************************************************************


TH 1/28/04
There are lots of ideas for sure, but right now, the team is focused on the Combat balance, the GCW, the Jedi Revamp, Correspondent/CSR issues, the publish theme, getting the existing professions improved and the dungeons.


*************************************************************************


TH 1/19/04 (HAM revamp...assuming this is combat revamp)
The HAM revamp will address all of that. It will repair everyone's specials, it will solve the slow downs in combat and many other things. The challenge is that its a core game system and its going to take a bit because people from many different teams have to be involved.


**************************************************************************


TH 2/12/04 (ouch...when I first read this...I thought it might come back to haunt him)
One message that is load and clear is that the combat balance is very important and we all know it is. So that means we have to get the combat balance done and in and polished.


**************************************************************************


TH 2/13/04
For the most part, the combat balance is just coding atm


and this


There is much more to the combat balance. The biggest change you will see is in the way the HAM works. It will have more of a regen effect rather than a "diminishing returns" kind of effect. On top of this, defense stacking, specials and all of the combat "components" will be tweaked for more fun and challenging play


***************************************************************************


TH 1/21/04
No, the development for the combat balance is being done all along. The develpment time for things like this is longer than most players realize. The "In Concept" cycle for combat roles per se is so that if players have any really great ideas pertaining what defines a profession's combat role, it can be added.


Once the basic design is done and the combat balance moves to the In-Dev phase, things can be tweaked a bit, but no major additions can be included. I thought it was important to get players ideas on combat roles and the dev team agreed.


**************************************************************************


TH 2/13/04
I pushed very hard for the combat balance and the team agreed so basically they did the crackdown stuff and then did as much of the Combat Balance as possible. The combat balance items that were selected because they effected creatures so much. The first part of the combat balance was balancing the creature table


AND


I'll be preparing some Combat Balance stuff for next week that will help everyone get on the same page for going forward


***************************************************************************


TH 3/3/04
This is something Im checking to see if we can address in the weapon balance part of the larger combat balance, but I don't know what the answer might be. And in any event, concentrating on these minor things before the weapon balance isn't productive. We'll want to look at things when the combat balance is on TC


AND


Actually the game will be easier at the high end because the "invulnerable" templates will be fixed and all professions will be on a level playing field, but in any event, this is something we need to focus on after the HAM revamp goes to TC in Pub 8 and after the Combat Balance goes into effect (tentatively Pub 9 and holding...)


****************************************************************************


TH 4/12/04 (time for another meeting???)
We did have a meeting today and I fought hard to get the combat balance put back on the plate. By my reckoning, it represents about 35-40% of the player issues. Would you say thats a wrong direction? I'm always open to ideas that speak to the most players at any given time.


*****************************************************************************


TH 3/2/04
As far as combat template stacking, this is all part of the combat balance. I mentioned early on that we'd be going through a painful period and this is it. Once the HAM revamp hits the system (keep your fingers cross, it should be in Publish 8) all of these changes will make more sense. It will change the way combat plays and the majority of the discussion points regarding combat will change. Many players are still seeing the way the system was or is, and not as it will be.


The core interaction of combat pools will still work the same, but the way it feels in combat will be different. Once it goes to TC, Im hoping to see all the combat experts get online and play it out so we can tweak it - - it will be a critical period. I know Im anxious to see it


********************************************************************************


TH 4/13/04


Atteke wrote:


Thunderheart could you guys put the combat balance on Test Centre in it's current condition like you did with the new HAM system in January? just so we can take a look at it.


-Thanks



Not really. Not for now anyway. You see, if we put it on Test Center, we'd have to push it out in Publish 9 with the the way the process works. Once a clump of code is integrated, "its in there". Thats where the sanbox that we've been talking about comes into play. This sandbox would be like a second Test Center, but configured in a way where it would be insulated from the live code and we would be able to push different versions out much easier without interfering with current process.


*********************************************************************


TH 4/19/04
Originally, the Combat Balance was delayed and I worked with the correspondents to get a list of "must haves" from the various profession communities. Since that time, I've have stressed the importance of the combat balance with the team and we are getting it back into the mix, though as you might guess, the schedule is pretty full. Because of logistics, its going to take a couple weeks of information gathering on the technical side before we have a plan to move forward on. We will see the CB soon though.


***********************************************************************


TH 4/19/04


We're in the planning stages now. I want to help set expectations as best I can. At this early stage, I would make the following comments:


- The biggest change in the CB that will be a "sensation", and by that I mean something that players will


change them after the CB gets published.


5/29/04
What will change is the mechanical balance - - especially with the HAM revamp portion of the CB


We can also further tweak the Smuggler’s combat role in the combat balance


The combat balance will bring elements of both to a Swordsman’s specials with the lions share of focus on re-tweaking the current specials to be more effective


These are two very important melee considerations for the combat balance


1 Answer to rule them all¦


In closing, one thing that is very important to keep in mind is realistic expectations.The reality is that there are a huge number of player questions and answers that hang on the combat balance.What I don’t want to see happen is that because many questions revolve around a tight group of answers that the scope of the work gets expectations set so high that they are impossible to meet.We all have high hopes for the combat balance and the certainty that the Combat Balance is very, very important.We are putting a strong focus on special training and hardware to give the effort a leg up and will make this as cool as possible, but I wouldn’t look on it as a magic bullet, but more as an exciting change in direction.


*****************************************************


TH 4/22/04 (OUCH OUCH)


Why is it going to take more than a year post-launch to make this happen?


It's not. We've been talking about things internally a lot. I've stressed the importance of these changes and everyone agrees. We've been going over the implementation details for a couple of weeks now so that we can get this back on track. JustG will be going into more detail in his next State of the Game letter which will be coming out in the next couple of days.


******************************************************


TH 6/3/04


This is definitely a topic we can discuss further in our upcoming Combat Balance focus threads.


...and this is another great example of something the correspondents and I will want community input on during the testing while the CB sandbox is up.


This is an early answer and is subject to change, but one of our goals for Commandos in the Combat Balance is to change the way Heavy Weapon modifiers work


...but we wont know until the Combat Balance sandbox is live).


When the Combat Balance begins (which will be soon), the correspondents and some players will be brought on to a special Combat Balance server


Lightsabers have been balanced against the system after the combat balance


The most important component to this is to keep giving good, solid feedback to your correspondent so I can bring these opinions to the development team while the CB sandbox is live.


You can look forward to sweeping changes in terms of functionality, speed, etc.But again, I stress, we talk about this topic a great deal in a conceptual form.The rubber is going to meet the road when we bring the correspondents and other players onto the Combat Balance Sandbox server


Again, absolutely.These changes are the types of things we want to address in the Combat Balance


Squad Leader


What is the SL revamp timeframe?. It's still going take place after the combat rebalance, correct?


Its going to be released in the same publish


To answer your question though, this is something we can, and will, talk about during the Combat balance


Yes, Black Sun Razor Knucklers will be back in the game after the combat balance


****************************************************


TH 6/14/04



Waste93 wrote:


How about some info on the combat revamp. There are lots of rumors floating around on this one. And since the answer to just about every question the combat professions ask is "wait for the rebalance" it would be helpful.



Once we get through the Jedi Revamp, I'll be posting lots of thread. We'll have a lot of focus threads and the like and after P9, I'll start making the weekly roundtable have a CB focus to cover specific issues.


*******************************************************************


TH 6/10/04
Weaponsmith
Are stun weapons going to see a major rebalance within the future?


Yes. Stun weapons (particularly stun batons) were never intended to be "the weapon" that everyone wants because it is the most effective. SWG’s weapons were always supposed to have a variety of useful and efficient weapons available, but here again, with all the tweaks and changes over the last 8+ months have caused a series of imbalances. This is definitely something that will be looked at during the combat balance.


*******************************************


96)?96:this.scrollHeight)"


TH 7/15/04: I will be immediately working with the correspondents and the community to develop a list of pre-combat balance fixes
Gary Gattis's State of the Game Letter (around pub 8!): We are cranking on the Combat Balance, and we think development on it will span 2 more publishes.




Novock
Cr|mson Kn|ghtsCo-Leader of <-CK->
Tim-bo
Cr|mson Kn|ghts- Architect/Droid Engineer/Merchant

Kalano
Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:06 pm
#2

Not to be a toady, but honestly, how is this suppose to help us get the CURB any sooner? It really only spreads more anger and hate.



I want the CURB to happen now just as much as any other commando or profas the next guy. But making more hate for the devs does nothing in helping us in the end.



_______________________________________________________________________

Blah, Blah, Blah, Yackity, Smackity. Its all the same bull, just new packaging

Ithorians do it in stereo - Ikkoso Ylise

So long, and thanks for all the fish.
Novock
Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:11 pm
#3

The original post was posted by someone other than me. It was deleted and believe wrongfully so I put the quote section of it back up. Just want the Devs to start talking, thats it just start spreading some info I don't believe its to mcuh to ask after we have waited through all the above.



Novock
Cr|mson Kn|ghtsCo-Leader of <-CK->
Tim-bo
Cr|mson Kn|ghts- Architect/Droid Engineer/Merchant

Kalano
Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:23 pm
#4

No, its never to much to ask them to talk to us, but to point out every broken promise and everything they said doesn't promote talking.


If someone does that to me, reminding me of everything i have said, i just shut up and never have a desire to speak to them again. I wouldn't expect different from the devs either.


Communication is a two way street. Piss off the other driver who has a bigger car and you end up with a wreck that no one will love.




i would love to see more communication from the devs, but i truely feel that this is going the wrong direction.



_______________________________________________________________________

Blah, Blah, Blah, Yackity, Smackity. Its all the same bull, just new packaging

Ithorians do it in stereo - Ikkoso Ylise

So long, and thanks for all the fish.
Novock
Wed Dec 08, 2004 12:40 pm
#5

Or they can acknowledge why we are so frustarted and start to change it. It doesn't have to be the way you suggest only if its choosen. And that seems to be to be the easy wayout to blame the negative posts for the lack of communication. Blame the player who is upset from the Devs staying quite for the Devs staying quiet. I believe its just another excuse. Its the vagu timeframes that get them in trouble. Saying these are some of the general things that will be occurring and as more and more stuff become hardfast sharing those items wouldn't get them in trouble of people reposting their quotes but it would releave a lot of the stress not just between some community members and the devs but now an increasing fued by members and members.



Novock
Cr|mson Kn|ghtsCo-Leader of <-CK->
Tim-bo
Cr|mson Kn|ghts- Architect/Droid Engineer/Merchant

TK-863
Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:49 am
#6

/hi5 novak


Communication, IS a 2 way street, but you can't have ANY relationship or communication w/o honesty. It is NEVER bad to air out a festering wound, sunshines is just as good as any antibiotic.



My Name is CPL Audri Fisher. Master Rifleman until the day I die.
grmork wrote:

Well. We have til the 15th so lets beat the snot out of each other and enjoy it for the time have left to us. I'll see you guys out there.
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next