Commando Archive

This is an open invitation to the devs. I don't know if you have any type of weapon consultants there. Based on what I've seen so far in regards to heavy weapons it has got me wondering. As such if this is something that you could use feel free to contact me. Granted all my experience has been in real world weaponary but some basic things about weapons don't really change. If this is something you would be interested in please contact me. If not me I'm sure you could also find a number of other qualified people here that could help clear up some of the confusion that has developed. I am not asking to be the commando correspondent. Just someone that know a lot about weapons that ideas can be bounced off of that is outside your group and that has a fair amount of experience with them.

dude..don't count on a response.......plus why would they "bouce ideas" off you?............your not on the pay roll

Serevok

my flamethrower is a gorgs worst nightmare

NEWSFLASH #3

SWG is not set in 2003.

---

dopkick wrote:

NEWSFLASH #3

SWG is not set in 2003.

---

ya, SW weapons should be BETTER

I'm not counting on a response. And I know the weapons aren't based in 2003 but there are some universal constants about weapons. The idea behind ranged weapons is to put RANGE between you and the target. An ideal range of 0 for a rocket launcher. Did anyone even think about this? Next thing they'll have the same range for grenades. Are we suppose to be suicide troops? Guess not since even these weapons aren't going to do much damge. The ideal range for a flamethrower should be 10-15m. Not 0. If you want a 0 range weapon then it isn't a ranged weapon. It's a melee weapon by definition. The acid rifle seems to be a flamethrower that shoots acid instead. It should have the same range as a flamethrower. All the other weapons should be rifle range weapons.