Commando Archive
Thread: NERF COMMANDO!!!
Page 2 of 2
JavaAz
Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:26 pm
#14
No, I watched the rancor burn ... but once he got within range (no cheeZball pets for me, thanks) the HAR did quite well.
Lifylos
Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:32 pm
#15
Mountaineer1978 wrote:
1) How'd you do your Signature?
2) The new commando nerf, In my opinion being a Master Commando - Commando is better. IRL if you burnt someone and caught them on fire all over, then shot them again Would they burn more or just get more initial damage?
They'd get more Initial Damage - but hten the Flames would stay the same
Common misconception here. Flamethrowers do not actually throw flame, they launch highly presurized Napalm. Napalm is a liquid, gelatin type thing, that is hotter than liquid magma...much hotter...
And yes If I shot someone, and covered half of their torso in napalam, and then shot again and covered the other half, the napalm after the second shot would be doing more damage, because there would bemore of it, burning hotter.
there is actually no flame involved in the flamethrower...
Raptor2k1
Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:43 pm
#16
Well whatever the case, something immune to heat wouldn't really be effected by one, regardless of whether or not it's fire.
And I still say we need more real commando guns, this focus on the FT is silly - it should be more of a situational weapon.
JavaAz
Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:51 pm
#17
Well, perhaps I was mistaken, but I will try again another time. However, I hear a lot of whining about HAR, but I seem to be getting good results ... am I unique, or expecting too little?
Lifylos
Wed Feb 18, 2004 10:53 pm
#18
JavaAz wrote:
Well, perhaps I was mistaken, but I will try again another time. However, I hear a lot of whining about HAR, but I seem to be getting good results ... am I unique, or expecting too little?
You are experiencing too little. The HAR is an excellent weapon...but its skill mods dont stack, which means you dont get any better with it ever until master, and then you only get slightly better. you get 30 accuracy, and 15 speed. And thats it. That is our gripe(Aside from it being the FT lite)
Devir92
Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:00 pm
#19
JavaAz wrote:
Well, perhaps I was mistaken, but I will try again another time. However, I hear a lot of whining about HAR, but I seem to be getting good results ... am I unique, or expecting too little?
The main problem with the HAR is that i's a watered down FT, with broken accuracy mods. It's ideal ranges are gigged, and it takes up a full tree. Itsuffers from the exactsame limitations as the FT and does nothing special with it's specials. No DoT, nothing to represent the corrosive properties of acid....waste of a tree, basically.
Bal-renco
Wed Feb 18, 2004 11:20 pm
#20
Barris wrote:As one of these commandos put it, would you rather $100 up front, or $20 per month for life?I prefer DoT over inital damage.
Looking at it the way a Commando should, since you're probably only going to live a month anyways, better get it all up front.
Raanan
Thu Feb 19, 2004 12:14 am
#23
wait, did they finally fix the har mods so they stack correctly? I haven't been able to log on really since my isp drops me every 10-15 minutes
Page 2 of 2