Commando Archive
Thread: /sigh....Garvin?
No matter how much you bend to try, you end up with a cracked spine.
tacwraith wrote:
dude trying to expect something from SOE is like trying to lick your own balls.
No matter how much you bend to try, you end up with a cracked spine.
ROFLMFAO
Funniest damned thing I have read in a LOOOOOOOONG time....
garvin wrote:
CU
Woah there Chief!!!!! Combat "Upgrade"?????
I hate the new lingo. The developers are doing the "spin room shuffle" there. Reminds me of all the "Weapons of Mass Destruction," "Coalition of the Willing," etc.buzzwords that have been rotating all over the U.S. for the last several years.
Combat was broke when the game came out. "Combat Fix" is appropriate.
Subsequent attempts by the developers to fix combat have screwed the pooch and left everything REALLY unbalanced. "Combat balance" or "Combat re-balance" is appropriate.
In fact, "Combat restructure," "Combat repair," "Combat reorganization," and "Combat renovation" would all be wholly appropriate.
However, combat "UPGRADE"?!?!?!?!? Fixing that broke-ass stuff the developers never quite got right is NOT an upgrade. That's like breaking a kid's toy car, glueing it back together, and then telling the kid "Here I UPGRADED it for you."
I think all players should refuse to call it a combat "upgrade." Instead it should be "FTF"....Fixing the FUBAR. ![]()
nbd9k wrote:
normally, i would not endorse a message as such, but i totally agree. combat upgrade is cushy, so as not to imply something is broken, but this game has serious ground issues. forget about names, just fix it already. hows the sandbox stuff comming garvin?
why on earth does it take like 3 months to do this? with like the ENTIRE team working on it? is this a new expansion or somthing? holy moly man..
nbd9k wrote:
i dunno, i expect mini patches and a few basic improvements, but considering the scope of the changes that they are implementing, they could never do one profession at a time. thisisnt like overhaulling image designer. this is entirely redefining how combat professions interact on the battlefield. i recommend working on JTL. its quite involving, and more than enough of a distraction for me, at least.
but its absolutely silly on how they are going to balance, and add new stuff... you need to add teh new stuff, then balance it, although its not already balanced so they need to do that first...its a cycle, pumping out a major patch with teh "fixes" is imperrative because many are pissed on how jedi kill things, commando sucks, and whatnot, FIX the game first THEN implement new things... It will be a lot easier to balance if you already have it balanced rather than doing two at once. balancing new things take extensive testing, balancing takes a lot less, doing both is just wrong
Woah there Chief!!!!! Combat "Upgrade"?????
I hate the new lingo. The developers are doing the "spin room shuffle" there. Reminds me of all the "Weapons of Mass Destruction," "Coalition of the Willing," etc.buzzwords that have been rotating all over the U.S. for the last several years.
Combat was broke when the game came out. "Combat Fix" is appropriate.
Subsequent attempts by the developers to fix combat have screwed the pooch and left everything REALLY unbalanced. "Combat balance" or "Combat re-balance" is appropriate.
In fact, "Combat restructure," "Combat repair," "Combat reorganization," and "Combat renovation" would all be wholly appropriate.
However, combat "UPGRADE"?!?!?!?!? Fixing that broke-ass stuff the developers never quite got right is NOT an upgrade. That's like breaking a kid's toy car, glueing it back together, and then telling the kid "Here I UPGRADED it for you."
I think all players should refuse to call it a combat "upgrade." Instead it should be "FTF"....Fixing the FUBAR
Look at it this way...Combat is in BETA .9...now its being upgraded to Version 1.0 ![]()