Commando Archive

Thread: protest, noone take garibaldi's place

dopkick
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:05 am
#14






Harvydood wrote:

what are you talking about? Protest, right, look I want the class fixed, and I sure hope there are others who do also. This is insanity, they just start fixing classes, and you want us to not have a voice, not tell them about our experiences, not get answers, or improvements.


Don't say their not going to do anything anyway, because that's just as crazy, everyone knows we have problems, even the patchers We will get fixed, but it would take a longer time without someone taking his place.







Correspondents are worthless. They DO NOT listen to them. What good will it do if someone is offering up their ideas when they're just deleted?
dopkick
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:23 am
#15

Why don't people understand that we've told them what needs to be done? Also, they SHOULD check these forums as it's a more all encompassing view of what needs to be done for the profession. A correspondent might be slanted one way or the other and won't provide the whole story. On an open and shut textbook fix that's fine, but not when the entire class doesn't work.
Celtic_Crippler
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:31 am
#16






Harvydood wrote:

Then posting is just as worthless, and playing is just as worthless, so let's all quit! yay, that will show the Multibillion dollar conglomerate. . . /sarcasim off


This game has been out what? a month? 6 weeks? If you want to give up, then give up, crawl under a rock, you feel cheated, okay. You really think sitting around feeling sorry for yourself will make it better? The Dev's don't listen, the Dev's don't fix us, well their sure as hell not going to listen to us, or fix us, when no one is telling them that we need something fixed.


You think they'll want to browse our forum with all the bitching and whining mixed with good ideas? nota chance, we will always need a voice, if we want even a hope of having anything done.






Last time I checked we all paid for our own accounts, least I did. That gives us the right to voice our opinion in any manner we see fit about the product we purchased. Dont like seeing the negative posts? Stop reading the forums, cause your going to see a whole lot more negative posts then postitive ones.



StarkerSturm, Commando on Bloodfin

"To be realistic," says one member, "if you're in a combat environment where people are out there with assault rifles and heavy machine guns, your [stuff] is pretty weak if you're out there with a handgun. A handgun would typically be used for escape and evasion, which means that everything's gone to hell."
Special Weapons And Tactics Of The Navy Seals
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/military/2001/10/special_weapons_navy_seals/index4.phtml
Harvydood
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:35 am
#17

well someone should explain to me how sitting on ones hands doing nothing is better then atleast attempting to get the class what it needs/wants? Your not going to dent the ammount of money this game pulls in with just commandos, we're barley a precentage of the total gameplayers.


Do you work at all Dopkick? You see, when you work 8 hours a day, you don't want to then browse 32 forums to see what you can do later, definatly not when 80% of the posts are this is beta, I'm quitting, ect ect. So they have someone do it, and they talk to the correspondents whom talk to the professions. By not having a correspondent, we effectivly put everything in their hands and their testing.


As for already telling them what needs to be done....well those that Q hasn't burned to the ground should just continue to be brought up....


You think it's bad now, it would only be worse without a correspondent.




Harv. . .
dopkick
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:36 am
#18

Part of their job should be to browse the forums.
Harvydood
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:41 am
#19

I don't even know what your talking about, I'm not a dev, I couldn't give 2 **edit**s what your crying about. My point is that someone who works 8 hours, is not going to browse our forum and 31 others to see what they can fix with their next patch. Maybe in a perfect world they would, but this ain't it.


I'm better off with a correspondent, and sois the rest of our profession, If the idea that a voice is better then no voice is so complex a concept...then I dunno.




Harv. . .
dopkick
Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:59 am
#20



Harvydood wrote:

I don't even know what your talking about, I'm not a dev, I couldn't give 2 **edit**s what your crying about. My point is that someone who works 8 hours, is not going to browse our forum and 31 others to see what they can fix with their next patch. Maybe in a perfect world they would, but this ain't it.

I'm better off with a correspondent, and sois the rest of our profession, If the idea that a voice is better then no voice is so complex a concept...then I dunno.




Yep, you're definately not a business major. What part of "SOE is ignoring correspondents" don't you understand? The ignoring part?
Harvydood
Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:18 am
#21

Oh no, you madeteh funny!


What part of doing something is always better then doing nothing don't you understand? Look you want to sit around and feel sorry for yourself, quit, go do whatever else you are going to do? fine, feel free...actually, after reading the other posts on this board from you, this will be my last post on this topic, your set in the idea that If I cry my eyes out, someone will give me something stop. Just hope that patch isn't up to your standards so you can quit and my eyes won't bleed everytime I seeyour half wit post with no content.




Harv. . .
Celtic_Crippler
Wed Aug 13, 2003 4:41 am
#22






Harvydood wrote:

Oh no, you madeteh funny!


What part of doing something is always better then doing nothing don't you understand? Look you want to sit around and feel sorry for yourself, quit, go do whatever else you are going to do? fine, feel free...actually, after reading the other posts on this board from you, this will be my last post on this topic, your set in the idea that If I cry my eyes out, someone will give me something stop. Just hope that patch isn't up to your standards so you can quit and my eyes won't bleed everytime I seeyour half wit post with no content.






If your eyes bleed so much, stop reading the forums lol. See was that so hard to do?



StarkerSturm, Commando on Bloodfin

"To be realistic," says one member, "if you're in a combat environment where people are out there with assault rifles and heavy machine guns, your [stuff] is pretty weak if you're out there with a handgun. A handgun would typically be used for escape and evasion, which means that everything's gone to hell."
Special Weapons And Tactics Of The Navy Seals
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/military/2001/10/special_weapons_navy_seals/index4.phtml
SizzleMyNizzle
Wed Aug 13, 2003 9:42 am
#23

One of my main points is, I don't get paid to do their job, I pay to play this game. If they want someone to be a correspondent and work for them, to tell them ideas and how things should work, then they should pay you. I'm not getting paid to play this game. Besides, they are developers, they can make a **edit** commando any time they want and test it, and guess what, they won't have fun playing doing crap damage either.


If they want us to be their bitches then they should pay us, or give the correspondent a few in game perks,



Sizzle


Corbantis


KolwynKithaeran
Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:03 pm
#24

just keep resending Garibaldi's emails until they address all those issues.



Kolwyn Kithaeran- Rebel Commando in-training
dopkick
Wed Aug 13, 2003 12:05 pm
#25

I'm definately quitting. This game is the biggest pile of sh1t I've seen in ages.
Page 2 of 2