Cities And Housing Archive

Thread: Reduce the base footprint!! PLEASE!!!

Anarkya
Fri Mar 04, 2005 6:57 am
#1

Dear game developper,

Since you have changed the rule in the game, my city decided to participate and install many bases.


We have 8 total and one of em in a hospital.


Here's the problem. Once the bases are there. We dont have places for the cantina, medical center, cloning, parking, bank...


The base footprint is way to large for us to place something near. These base are in the core of our city. Since we cannot re-deed em well... They are there for good and since their footprint are too large well... no service in my small city.


I am asking you to reduce that foot print.


Im sure I am not the only mayor who have that problem.

Since then, Its a puzzle to place stuff there. So far, parking and bank is the only thing I was able to place.


so PLEASE reduce it.


AnarK'Ya



.:. AnarK'Ya - Old jedi .:.
.:. Dosenoffner - Dark Twilek .:.
.:. Nellaf Legna - Vampire .:.
.:. Bloodfin .:.

Danto1
Fri Mar 04, 2005 7:00 am
#2

agree, smaller footprint = more bases = more GCW



Danto / Daisee Dook
DrunkWookiee / Emperors Ho|Mayor of MASH
Resources Vendor at Mashedville, Naboo -6159 -3749
Treasure Maps should be a challenge!
Lifere
Fri Mar 04, 2005 9:22 am
#3

That would be the problem with reducing the footprint.
It would make it much harder to take out each base.

Personally I do not think this is a good idea, even though it would be the same for both sides.
If they did decide to reduce it, you would be looking at 6 months min for testing.
It may be more feasible to move the city.

Just my humble opinion.



KVH Mall vendor: 2532, -4444, Mos Eisley - Tatooine.
Please only Drop off on Vendor: Loot and Such
Lifere - (12pt) Master Architect ¥ (14pt) Master Artisan ¥ Master Swordsman
(Over 50 Crystals on my vendor - Color and clear;Recycler parts & Schems, much more)
Current Resource Database SWG Merchant Database
MadeEvil
Fri Mar 04, 2005 10:09 am
#4

Well the footprints expand is where I have my problem I can make room for them in a city but when they expand and one of the houses around them gets deleted we have to pick the base up and replace a house. If they didn't expand it would be so much nicer

Also I'd like to see slightly smaller footprints on turrets as well how cool would it be to have 2 turrets in front of city hall.



- Elmer
Danto1
Fri Mar 04, 2005 11:36 am
#5

it is far too easy to take out bases atm, smaller footprint means that it may become hard to take them out



Danto / Daisee Dook
DrunkWookiee / Emperors Ho|Mayor of MASH
Resources Vendor at Mashedville, Naboo -6159 -3749
Treasure Maps should be a challenge!
teh_n00b123
Fri Mar 04, 2005 3:08 pm
#6

they probaly have large footprints so you don't pack a bunch of bases together, they're ment to be spaced out..plus I think they're kind of ment to sit outside a city, instead of packed inside them.




-I support a Galactic Civil War fought between regular, average players... Simply strict, hardlined Imperials & freedom lovin' Rebels fighting for control of the galaxy. A Galactic Civil War fought not with glowsticks or lightsabers, but with blasters, lances, and how much guts you have. A Galactic Civil War which reflects the timeline, the destruction of the Death Star, the absolute control which the Empire has and the brave Rebels trying to break up that reign... The extinction of all but a few rare and special Jedi. That my friends, is the Galactic Civil War and that is what we have to aim for.
Svoko-Riola
Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:03 am
#7

I agree, bases should be very challenging to take out and decreasing the footprint would help. You should be able to concentrate them. This would force people to work in large groups to take them out.



Svoko Riola
Lowca
Master Creature Handler/Master Rifleman
Owner of Eternal Zoo in Eternal, Naboo
Anarkya
Sun Mar 06, 2005 7:47 am
#8

No, Its West to NYMS on Bloodfin.


We have 8 bases so far, need turrets too but wonder how we gonna put this in city...


I understand everyone point where you guys say its made to be put outside city but We want a imperial city like a army area... city merge with bases....


Or at least being able to de-deed em... so that If it takes too much place to one place, you can see it and change it.





.:. AnarK'Ya - Old jedi .:.
.:. Dosenoffner - Dark Twilek .:.
.:. Nellaf Legna - Vampire .:.
.:. Bloodfin .:.

Torip-Sunwalker
Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:33 pm
#9

hehheh your city wouldnt happen to be in the north western most corner of Theed would it?
NexusSyndicateFounder
Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:31 pm
#10

Less of a footprint would mean you could hide bases in the mountains or more rugged areas which would be very cool.



Amphion Dakmar
Dark Forces <DF>

Alukolli
Sun Mar 06, 2005 8:44 pm
#11







MadeEvil wrote:
Well the footprints expand is where I have my problem I can make room for them in a city but when they expand and one of the houses around them gets deleted we have to pick the base up and replace a house. If they didn't expand it would be so much nicer



do actually houses vanish if you place an base in your city?




____________________________________________________________________________________ Name: Craminu
Profession: Trader-structure-enginnering
Vendor: 1810 4749 Jackpot on LOK
Vendor goods: Architect Structures-Resources-
Custom orders: yes by mail-Architect/artisan goods
Guild: Charm
Mayor of jackpot
MadeEvil
Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:57 am
#12

No but if a house doesn't pay maintance and gets deleted you have to remove the base to put a house their again.



- Elmer
Page 1 of 1
Previous Next