Cities And Housing Archive

1. The need to make a few adjustment to Player Cities




• Restrictplayer cities tojust the"common planets"




• Tatooine, Naboo, Corella, Rori, Talus


• High End MOB planets like Lok&Dantooine shoud not have player cities. They allow playerstooeasy access to high end mobs


• Restrict the building of any player structure within a 2,000m radius of NPC Cities


• Restrict the building of any player city to 5,000m of another Player city


• Restrict the building of any player structer to within 1,000m of a POI


• Restrict the building of any player housing outside a Player City (see #2 before commeting)


2. Need to tweek the NPC Cities a little




• "Apartments" and "houses" should be allowed to be rented by players. They can decorate them, store items in then, just like a house except they are part of a NPC City




• Failure to pay rent (maintaince goes to 0) means that you are evected and you lose everything in that residence


• You can tell if the building is vacant as the name of it will be vacant. Renting the place can only be named "Player X's" Residence


• Allow Guilds to rent the Guild Halls in the NPC Cities




• Failure to pay rent (maintaince goes to 0) means that you are evected and you lose everything in that residence


• You can tell if the building is vacant as the name of it will be vacant. Renting the place can only be named "Guild X"


• Faction Based NPC cities (like Bestine, Theed,and AH) would only be for players in that Faction and guilds in that faction. There would not be a lot of these cities, but enough to draw people that are interested in that.


• Increase the stature of the NPC cities on Dantooine and Lok to allow for renting of residence


3. Need to Tweek the High End MOB planets




• Endor and Dathimer would have a BAN on any vehicles


• You want to go there, get a mount or go on foot!


• This would require a challange to get there and back making people thing twice about just heading out there!

Now, some of these would cause some strife, but to me if you have something now that violates the above suggestion, you would be "grandfathered" in. However, you would not be able to redeed as once you lift it, you are now help to the rules. Existing player cities within 1,000m of a POI would not be able to add more structures, but would also not lose any that they currently had.

These are just my thoughts, take them for what they are. But IMO something has to be done to clean up the "trash" that is out there. Player houses all over the place and just outside of Mos Eisley is just lame (IMO) and is really junking up the look and feel of the game.