Cities And Housing Archive
Thread: Housing on player cities only planet
Page 1 of 1
RIP101
Fri Aug 12, 2005 9:30 pm
#1
Why cant we dig like holes into dath grounds then decorate the insides of it, like a cave.
drachenfire
Sat Aug 13, 2005 12:33 am
#2
Just and idea, what do you think ifa planet was created, simular to Naboo and or Corellia but without any central govenrment like Dantooine (for the frountieer feel), but that there were 50 different "city zone" markers designating where cities could be, and only buildings can be placed in the city, leaving the countryside free of housing (excelpt resource gatherier).
I know some would insisit that housing in player cities is a choice and would limit where homes could to, and it would be true. I dont see it ever happening on the first set of planets, but maybe on a furture planet,
Anywho, just a thought anyway.
I really wish we could have "simm city" tools to alter terrine and generally make a city far more visually attractive and static like. I love the static cities, and know player cities would just "pop" and become fantastic if we could make them look like them.
bluejanus
Mon Aug 15, 2005 12:05 am
#3
RIP101 wrote:
Why cant we dig like holes into dath grounds then decorate the insides of it, like a cave.
Because we're not hobbits.
KingGigli
Tue Aug 16, 2005 2:56 pm
#4
a new planet would be cool. i really want to see coruscant in the works.
-Niko-
Wed Aug 17, 2005 1:49 pm
#5
I'd like to see hoth, with a new set of "snow" structures or bunker/igloo style homes
HeroicKnight
Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:50 pm
#6
Ya and wookies aren't wood elves, but they still live in trees. Tatooine is the perfect planet to allow caves on. Why, because logically people would live in caves to get out of the heat. Actually, in the start wars universe some did.
I think Kash would be the perfect planet to force you to only live in PAs. Why? Because the ground is too dangerous to live on, so everyone must live in trees. And living in a single tree all by yourself is extremely pointless unless you have a bridge connected to a tree city, or can swing like Tarzaan from tree to tree.
I think Kash would be the perfect planet to force you to only live in PAs. Why? Because the ground is too dangerous to live on, so everyone must live in trees. And living in a single tree all by yourself is extremely pointless unless you have a bridge connected to a tree city, or can swing like Tarzaan from tree to tree.
Mavericke
Fri Aug 19, 2005 11:16 am
#7
LOL love the wookie wood elf comment....
another thgin im sad to say we will probably never see.... the "sim city" tools.... god it would be nice but I dont think even the SWG "super servers" could handle it.... I could see a "sim" tool just so you could move houses around, that would be awesome for a mayor, but again... abuse... bah... they may give us some control over that at some date or maybe in an SWG2 but i wouldnt expect it anytime soon.... as for digging holes and flattengin land, dont expect it ever... just my personal input tho :l
TiryonUber
Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:38 pm
#8
bluejanus wrote:
RIP101 wrote:
Why cant we dig like holes into dath grounds then decorate the insides of it, like a cave.
Because we're not hobbits.
Teletubbys live in the ground.. so why cant we be teletubbys?
bluejanus
Fri Aug 19, 2005 4:57 pm
#9
drachenfire wrote:Just and idea, what do you think if a planet was created, simular to Naboo and or Corellia but without any central govenrment like Dantooine (for the frountieer feel), but that there were 50 different "city zone" markers designating where cities could be, and only buildings can be placed in the city, leaving the countryside free of housing (excelpt resource gatherier).I know some would insisit that housing in player cities is a choice and would limit where homes could to, and it would be true. I dont see it ever happening on the first set of planets, but maybe on a furture planet,Anywho, just a thought anyway.I really wish we could have "simm city" tools to alter terrine and generally make a city far more visually attractive and static like. I love the static cities, and know player cities would just "pop" and become fantastic if we could make them look like them.
You want a separate zoning flag for player cities? That's going to be interesting to convince the devs to do. Sounds like a lot of work. Going to have to manually change every player city and also implement the new flag on the new world.
Page 1 of 1