Cities And Housing Archive
Thread: I want to know what people think of this
Message Edited by Prem0nition on 02-06-2005 06:08 AM
Prem0nition wrote:
Personally, I think this stinks and it is pure griefing... something that my city saw happening with the new changes to city politics...
the changes were good, but easily lead to this sort of griefing and the mayors and citizens of towns really need some sort ofassurance from theDEVsand CSRs that if someone pulls this sort of crap that they will be able to get their town back.
Message Edited by Prem0nition on 02-06-2005 06:08 AM
Two of the biggest misconceptions about player cities arethat the city belongs to anyone in particular, and/or that the founders of the city somehow have more right to it than others that may have come later. The city belongs to whomever does what is neccessary to take control and keep control of the city. It is painfully simple to keep a handle on zoning (I've done it for over a year), you keep your militia to a small trusted group(or don't have one), and immediately revoke zoning rights once any new citizens have placed their houses (either that or place the house yourself and transfer it to the new citizen). So if anyone allows the takeovertactic to succeed, it's because they'reignorant,inept, lazy, or simply don't care anymore.